91–100 of 200 posts
I have a fundamental question though: how is it different from directly connecting my web app's JS APIs with tool calling functions and talking directly with a LLM server with tool-call support?
Is it the same thing, but with a protocol? or am I missing the bigger picture?
Could all of this be replaced simply by publishing OpenAPI (Swagger) spec and using universal swagger mcp client ??? This basically leaves up to the user to establish authenticated session manually. Assuming claude is smart enough to pick up API key from prompt/config, and can use swagger based api client, wouldnt that be the same?
This MCP stuff is leading dev down the wrong path. We should be focusing on llms using self discovery to figure out information.
We should be focusing on llms using self discovery to figure out information. Can you expand? What does that mean, and why is the right (or better) path
The contributions for the Github project is quite intriguing: https://github.com/MiguelsPizza/WebMCP/graphs/contributors MiguelsPizza | 3 commits | 89++ | 410-- claude | 2 commits | 31,799++ | 0--
I did some git history re-visioning when I closed sourced the extension for a bit. So these are not super accurate. Claude code did write about 85% of the code though.
This looks promising - thanks for open-sourcing this. This addresses the gap that most work happens in browsers while MCP assumes that work happens with AI clients. I have a fundamental question though: how is it different from directly connecting my web app's JS APIs with tool calling functions and talking directly with a LLM server with tool-call support? Is it the same thing, but with a protocol? or am I missing t…
It's a protocol which allows the user to bring their own model to interact with the tools on your website
So if I'm using claude code and developing a web app, its running on localhost:3000, can I use claude code to basically get ui information, browser console logs and other web dev feedback and useful information? Cause I installed it and added that file but all I see is the 55 tools and 6 apis when i open the browser extension. not the stuff i need. and i also installed the extension tools i think it was called.
I still don't understand MCP. If according to all the AI companies soon AI will replace devs than why bother with MCP?
From the blog post: "The Auth problem At this point, the auth issues with MCP are well known. OAuth2.1 is great, but we are basically trying to re-invent auth for agents that act on behalf of the user. This is a good long term goal, but we are quickly realizing that LLM sessions with no distinguishable credentials of their own are difficult to authorize and will require a complete re-imagining of our authorization sy…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I did some git history re-visioning when I closed sourced the extension for a bit. So these are not super accurate. Claude code did write about 85% of the code though.
How can you figure out that percentage? The commit logs?