Earlier quoted context omitted.
The blog explains it: It can move its head, antennas, and rotate. It’s a little humanoid desk toy to stand in for computer interaction. It has nothing to do with the disrupting the “robot industry” like the Venture Beat headline says. It’s a little animated thing to house the AV equipment.
Maybe as “disruptive” to the robotic industry as a 3d printer is disruptive to the industrial machining sector.
From my understanding it's currently taking over low volume production, and the volume in which it's economically viable keeps increasing as the tech improves.
Is that incorrect? Do you have an insiders point of view?