161–170 of 1001 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah that's not even close to what's going on here. Grok is literally bringing up Hitler in unrelated topics. https://bsky.app/profile/percyyabysshe.bsky.social/post/3lti...
[flagged]
Good for her. Got paid a ton of money to be the fall guy and no one ever believed anything that went wrong with the company was her fault. That's a clean getaway in my book. Hopefully she can move on to something that isn't building Nazi chat bots.
pretty sure she did alot of reputational damage to herself along the way.
enjoy the retirement!
[flagged]
The other LLMs don't have a "disbelieve reputable sources" un safety prompt added at the owner's instructions.
Clearly Musk has put his hand on the scale in multiple ways.
> I’m immensely grateful to him for entrusting me But he didn't? She wasn't even in the loop for many of the consequential decisions
Rule #0 is you don't disparage the company on the way out. She may even have a contractual obligation not to.
Have any of the people who noisily joined X to make a big impact fast actually had a big impact over any time frame? Remember when G. Hotz said he was going to fix Twitter search in 6 weeks, and then it turned out that G. Hotz is just another midwit like anyone else and Twitter search is still as bad as ever? Yaccarino said they were going to transform Twitter into the "everything app" with payments, marketplaces, an…
Twitter is a graveyard being propped up grudgingly by people who don't want to have fewer followers elsewhere, and enthusiastically by other people as way to virtue signal alliance with the ownership's political incorrectness. It has no true value to anyone. It was going downhill already before the new ownership and for completely apolitical reasons.
A politically correct answer is one that keeps the currently politically powerful people happy, right? Musk/Trump defined politically correct for a couple months. I guess Musk might be politically incorrect now. Are they friends or enemies today?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Is this what happened in reality? Otherwise how is your theory applicable to this case?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> her legacy will forever be stained Where can I sell my legacy for $6 million/year?
My question is where does she go from here? Like if she became my CEO, I'd really worry about my company/job.
Being 62 is the perfect age for such roles. Young enough to climb a flight of stairs; old enough to nod appropriately to her new peers' references from the 1980s. Executive search firms will be eager to guide her into as many board roles as she might want.
> I’m immensely grateful to him for entrusting me But he didn't? She wasn't even in the loop for many of the consequential decisions