Live data from Hacker News

Why are there no good dinosaur films?

briannazigler.substack.com

441–450 of 485 posts

Re: Why are there no good dinosaur films?

#441
post #420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People were disappointed because they wanted just another rehash of The Matrix, but why do that when The Matrix already exists? The more interesting idea is to explore why people wanted another rehash of The Matrix, so the movie is about that instead.

I disagree. Nothing of value could be added through the contemporary lens. So leave it at that, no need for a new cash grab. It's not like Warner Bros is poor anyway..

I find this mindset funny because the movie is about this exact idea so by saying this idea has no value you are criticizing your own opinion.

Re: Why are there no good dinosaur films?

#443

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Assuming you are referring to The Council of Elrond, I think perhaps you're misremembering. The only characters who speak at length at the Council are Glóin, Elrond (whose account is mostly skipped over), Boromir, Gandalf (the longest account), Aragorn, Frodo and Bilbo. All of these are previously known characters except Boromir and he is certainly a major character. Plus they all add either new backstory about the r…

Glóin is Gimli's father, but it's true that he does really only appear in that chapter (if you've not read the Hobbit, you won't know much about him). Afterwards, though, Gimli travels with the Fellowship. Tolkien could have (and I believe in his notes he has versions) written the entire council, but he elides the parts that are "told elsewhere" - Bilbo, much of Gandalf and Elrond, and anything directly already told…

It's true that if you haven't read The Hobbit there are a few gaps (not least, exactly how Bilbo got the ring).

But Glóin actually appears in the previous chapter Many Meetings, where he is sat next to Frodo at the feast and introduces himself there.

Re: Why are there no good dinosaur films?

#444

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

IDK, it doesn’t take it away from what happened with the sequels and the fourth disaster at all that both brothers both happened to announce they are transgender. It’s really an amazing coincidence, two brothers, crazy.

[flagged]

Re: Why are there no good dinosaur films?

#445
post #401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, the same way LotR is not an allegory for WW1, but it's difficult to miss the connections, whether Tolkien intentionally placed them there, or simply because those themes were something he felt deeply about.

In both cases the artists were, as one would say, working through some stuff...

Turns out "You can't go home again" is a powerful storytelling frame

Re: Why are there no good dinosaur films?

#446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IDK, it doesn’t take it away from what happened with the sequels and the fourth disaster at all that both brothers both happened to announce they are transgender. It’s really an amazing coincidence, two brothers, crazy.

[flagged]

You have made a lot of incorrect assumptions. Like, almost all of them. Plus, as “a gay” I think it’s offensive you have confused our sexual preference with, an identity and then also conflated transgender to that. Sort of a mask off moment for you maybe?

Re: Why are there no good dinosaur films?

#447

The Alien, Terminator, and Matrix franchises have similar problems. Aliens successfully changed genres, from horror to action. But subsequent movies could never recapture the primal horror of the original or the fun action of the second. It's almost like there are only two local optima in the Alien movie universe and Alien + Aliens took them both. Terminator is the same. The first movie was a perfect sci-fi action mo…

To me, the sequels were worthwhile just for one solitary scene. In the third movie, Trinity is piloting the ship and has to gain higher than usual altitude for some reason that I've now forgotten. This takes her above the black clouds permanently enveloping the Earth. Sunlight pours into the cockpit. For the first and only time in her life, she sees the real sun with her own physical eyes. She's overwhelmed. It's jus…

I love how that scene looks but it doesn't work for me story-wise. They go up that high to get away from the machines but why wouldn't the machines build up to that level and put in giant solar collectors up there? Seems a lot easier. But it ruins the world they've built up to then so I understand why they didn't go farther with it.

Re: Why are there no good dinosaur films?

#448
post #353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Lesson learned: scripts for sequels of movies that have a strong fan-base should be written by people who really care about the franchise (and have good ideas)." As the originators of the Matrix franchise, the Wachowskis certainly fit that description.

[flagged]

I would claim that Matrix 2&3, Speed Racer and Cloud Atlas are incredible movies. What are your opinion on those movies?

Re: Why are there no good dinosaur films?

#449

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn’t think lotr used cgi

Andy Serkis was great, but not as good at shape-shifting. For LOTR renderfarm WETA bought a bunch of SGI 1200 dual core Pentium III 700MHz servers with 1GB RAM, 9 GB SCSI disks all running RedHat Linux. I've read at some point they had 192 SGI 1100 and 1200 servers working.

It’s mind blowing that you can rent one VM in the cloud with the same spec.

Here’s an example with nearly one kilocores: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/siz...

Re: Why are there no good dinosaur films?

#450

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Hobbit was more of a Disney theme park ride than a story.

There is an unofficial version of The Hobbit called the “m4 book edit” floating around that removes most of the extraneous junk. It’s vastly better than the theatrical versions.

If you want a good version of The Hobbit, you can just watch the Rankin-Bass version. It has good songs too.
Post reply on HN