Live data from Hacker News

OBBB signed: Reinstates immediate expensing for U.S.-based R&D

kbkg.com

391–395 of 395 posts

Re: OBBB signed: Reinstates immediate expensing for U.S.-based R&D

#391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Italian here, and I know a few things about fascism not just because of that. Yes, what is happening in the US is the rise of a fascist state controlled by a small minority of very wealthy and powerful people purely for economical reasons with Trump being just a tool in their hands. As with happened in my country back then, there are only two possible reasons for endorsing it: being part of the cult, or being part of…

Your nationality is not a credential, I don't know why Europeans can't understand this.

Having one of grandparents being part of the resistance and the other one helping it covertly, then spending a lot of time talking with them, something new generations miss a lot, counts however. This made me later extremely biased, of course, however as with many teens fascinated by fake ideals just because they make you look cool I experienced the fascism lure back in the early 80s, and actually embraced it for years because of immaturity, so I wasn't exactly immersed in a one sided environment (did I mention that my father sold his very profitable business because he feared that communists would rise in power and nationalize it?). What is happening in the US has been clear since January-February when they reached the point of no return; there are points a government must follow to become an oppressive regime, and the US govt checked all of them long ago. Once they start they can't stop until they either reach a tipping point of self preservation North Korea style, which is the more likely scenario, or they escalate further and further tightening their grip on the population to the point they screw it up entirely and a full scale revolution is ignited. One thing is certain: they can't go back: they broke so many laws that going back would mean prosecution for many of them.

Re: OBBB signed: Reinstates immediate expensing for U.S.-based R&D

#392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

China "won solar panels" because they subsidised the production to the point that their companies could sell panels cheaper than they cost to make, and then these companies were allowed to dump them below cost into the western markets to destroy all the local innovation. Germany and the US in particular just sat back and watched that happen. However, market share doesn't really translate into the economics of large s…

they're building that coal in the role of gas peaker plants - backup power. It will probably never be used at any significant % of capacity, as the solar and battery revolution continues to astound in its speed.

>Nobody but the 3rd world is increasing investments in coal/oil

This was the assertion. It is demonstratably false.

Re: OBBB signed: Reinstates immediate expensing for U.S.-based R&D

#393

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>But if something cheaper exists today, and nobody invests in the expensive thing I think you are talking past me. The green bodies have constantly touted how we already reached the inflection point where renewables are cheaper than coal, nuclear, etc. The quiet part that isn't spoken aloud is that these renewables were only economically positive with substantial subsidies and credits. You can't have an honest conver…

why does that matter anymore? they are cheaper now without incentives, so whether they were subsidized in the past doesnt really matter right?

Except this isn't the case. GP talks about how removing the incentives is "going to have a big negative impact on the economy" due to all these green projects no longer being viable. Indeed, whether they were subsidised or not in the past doesn't matter... but it's also not relevant to this discussion either.

Re: OBBB signed: Reinstates immediate expensing for U.S.-based R&D

#394

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Aren't Netherlands wages lower than Germany except for US big-tech and HFT? Generally you want to work for US companies, see the pragmatic engineers trimodal compensation article for details. The US thing works as you're cheap for them (relative to the US) but the wage is better than you can get locally.

Unfortunately there are no US companies hiring in my country. They all seem to be only in Dublin and Amsterdam.

Yeah, that's the problem. Basically to get the good wages, you need to live somewhere expensive. If you have property/friends in those places it makes lots of sense, but otherwise I'm not sure it does.

Re: OBBB signed: Reinstates immediate expensing for U.S.-based R&D

#395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I dunno, I live in NL but work remote for a US company

But then you're not part of NL jobs market but the US one, no?

Sortof, you get NL/EU employment benefits (and taxes) and a premium to NL wages, but you're not paid US wages (unfortunately).
Post reply on HN