Earlier quoted context omitted.
Aha, so Aristotle would say high-D types have an excess of prudence (or at least phronesis, in the sense of knowing how to turn affairs to one's own advantage) as well as a deficiency of justice?
Maybe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicomachean_Ethics Not all researchers in that field would 100% agree but I see D as the old dark triad (Narcissism, Machiavellianism, Psychopathy) plus Sadism which is conspicuously absent from the triad. My own take is that the modern moral rot is founded in Narcissism as described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture_of_Narcissism which was thought to be about the 1970s…
) I've been struggling to relocate some old convos so full responses will take some time :( So here I trade prudence for urgency :)
>The_Long_Con
I expect to find discussions of (at least) 2 time-scales there :)
(OT? Note that "prudence" morphed into "prude" (=prig) ... Only if you care to bite this "Calvinist" bait!)
>plus Sadism
Have to also revisit old Convo about "more cruelty than [absolutely?] necessary" VS psychopaths extracting benefits from win-win games
While looking for DISC numbers for Taiwan vs China (& similar studies comparing states of (Maha)Bharat)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/14/2613
>In other words, only by enhancing the competitiveness of individuals in the job market and acquiring problem-solving skills, can they enhance their psychological satisfaction.
Reminds me of Thiel's cooperate internally, compete externally. (? Generalizing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartle_taxonomy_of_player_type...)
I'm vibing that rightwingers prefer streaming because of the compressed time scales, while lefties prefer blogs because the game becomes more "iterated".. this "explains" (institution-supported) percolation of lefty narcissists attempting to cross timescales?
>I'd wish the losers could become psychopaths by having [per Aristotle... or Jefferson] some business *of their own* which they could mind. (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42254503)
Been mulling this (emphasis mine) as well.. that comment sounds now like giving GenA/Z Psycho-Ed (like Sex-Ed but not conducted by prigs)
Secondarily, their savings rate is not going where Thiel expects, which means one's gotta encourage them to redirect these savings to bootstrap their businesses
Psycho-Ed -> Psycho'ed (=purely motivational) venkatrao had a post teasing motivation vs meaning -- also 2 time-scales
https://contraptions.venkateshrao.com/p/be-history-or-do-his...
Reflexively, I'd guess that GenAZ can break the cycle because they can (potentially) get a more accurate sense of history than millennials. (Worse state capacity for formal education can help?) You'd want to look at ethnocultural crossovers in NYC (it looks promising that ICE is targeting Turkish agitators, because among frenemy immigrants, their polarization entropy most closely approximates that of the host nation-- ime)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42956827
[Only]>good at ripping off and seducing other High D people.
Thus suggesting that both sama & YC are high-D :) One would have to shake-off accusations of envy from the narcissists/prigs, if one weren't cool enough
Update: before today I was thinking that, unlike the further left, right+center+epsilon have always been able to coalesce around the very reasonable idea that institutions are fundamentally good (compared to the leftist version for individuals) but Paul's subaltern comment makes me wonder also about timescales with respect to genz/a building their own alt (LOW-KEY) institutions
Lagniappe https://youtu.be/qvdt2FZ0_B8
(Outcool'd Jeff goldblum from Jurassic park lol)
Okay over and out no more edits