11–20 of 421 posts
The issue really is that the AI isn’t good enough that people actually want it and are willing to pay for it. It’s like IPV6, if it really was a huge benefit to the end user, we’d have adopted it already.
Just from current ARR announcements: 3b+ anthropic, 10b+ oai, whatever google makes, whatever ms makes, yeah people are already paying for it.
Highways.
People would be less upset if ai is shown to support the person. This also allows that person to curate the output and ignore it if needed before sharing it, so it’s a win/win.
But is the big money in revolution?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> no one wants this, everyone hates this Is not false statistics. "Nobody wanted or asked for this" is literally true.
Proof by counterexample: I want this.
> Before proceeding let me ask a simple question: Has there ever been a major innovation that helped society, but only 8% of the public would pay for it? Highways.
> Before proceeding let me ask a simple question: Has there ever been a major innovation that helped society, but only 8% of the public would pay for it? Highways.
In my European country you have to pay a toll to use a highway. Most people opt to use them, instead of taking the old 2-lane road that existed before the highway and is still free.
The issue really is that the AI isn’t good enough that people actually want it and are willing to pay for it. It’s like IPV6, if it really was a huge benefit to the end user, we’d have adopted it already.