Live data from Hacker News

Drugged artist paints 8600 self-portraits

theage.com.au

1–10 of 11 posts

Re: Drugged artist paints 8600 self-portraits

#2
Don't take these as being accurate portraits of What A Particular Drug Does To You. My experience, as an artist who has dabbled in recreational chemistry, is that you can get a multitude of stylistic effects from a single drug, let alone many different ones.

For instance, THC will SOMETIMES give me a huge boost to my visualization powers, and I can hold enough in my mind at once that I feel like I'm tracing the image instead of drawing it. This doesn't happen all the time, or for the duration of the entire trip. It doesn't even always happen with the same strain.

YMMV, of course. But that's my experience of (far fewer than this guy has done) drugs plus art

Re: Drugged artist paints 8600 self-portraits

#3
Lots more of his photos here:

http://bryanlewissaunders.org/drugs/

Also, it's worth noting that only a small # of his portraits were painted while "under the influence" (though it sounds as if many were done while medicated).

Though I have experience with but a small fraction of his ... influences? ... his portraits definitely capture bits of the experiences I've shared. Clever.

Setting aside the artistically productive alcoholics and addicts, I assume that this is not the first artist to have intentionally dosed themselves for artistic purposes. Does anyone know of others?

Re: Drugged artist paints 8600 self-portraits

#4

Lots more of his photos here: http://bryanlewissaunders.org/drugs/ Also, it's worth noting that only a small # of his portraits were painted while "under the influence" (though it sounds as if many were done while medicated). Though I have experience with but a small fraction of his ... influences? ... his portraits definitely capture bits of the experiences I've shared. Clever. Setting aside the artistically product…

Uhm. How about:

SELECT * FROM ARTISTS WHERE ACTIVE_YEAR > 1966 AND ACTIVE_YEAR The Beatles and Sergeant Pepper (LSD) for instance.

Re: Drugged artist paints 8600 self-portraits

#6
This is nothing new. Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz, also known as Witkacy, was painting portraits of himself and friends under influence of drugs in mid-War Poland. He was actually making a living of it through his Portrayal Company (while at the same time writing ingenious prosaic, poetical and drama works that would make him famous), though most of the bespoke portraits were not drug-influenced, the so-called Type C being reserved for friends and acquaintances and created mostly during parties. Some of these portraits contained cryptic inscriptions next to the author's signature, indicating the influencing substances.

More on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanis%C5%82aw_Ignacy_Witkiewic...

A sample portrait (with an inscription hinting at alcohol and/or heroin): http://www.pinakoteka.zascianek.pl/Witkacy/Images/Nena_Stach...

More assorted portraits: http://images.google.pl/search?tbm=isch&source=hp&bi...

Re: Drugged artist paints 8600 self-portraits

#8

Lots more of his photos here: http://bryanlewissaunders.org/drugs/ Also, it's worth noting that only a small # of his portraits were painted while "under the influence" (though it sounds as if many were done while medicated). Though I have experience with but a small fraction of his ... influences? ... his portraits definitely capture bits of the experiences I've shared. Clever. Setting aside the artistically product…

It's difficult to evaluate the "intentionally" part (once you know its effects, is it intentional?) but absynthe comes to mind for XIX century painters, LSD and heroin for a lot of writers, painters and musicians in XX: Dalí, Parker, Huxley...

Re: Drugged artist paints 8600 self-portraits

#10
post #7

I find it a shame he's associating various, really clever artistic stlyes, techniques amd works with particular chemicals he's ingested/consumed. It cheapens his art and is making false equivalences.

I don't understand your perspective. He had an experience and painted what he experienced into a self-portrait. "Associating [...] styles" with drugs isn't the same thing. He sees what he sees and he paints it.

I read you as accusing him of insinuating something like "Picasso is Xanax" which isn't the case.

In short, he's neither implying nor creating this association, he's simply putting what he sees on canvas.

Post reply on HN