Earlier quoted context omitted.
> People who practice overemployment delude themselves that multiple jobs doesn’t affect their performance and therefore there’s nothing wrong with working multiple jobs. Their subreddit is a dumbfounding echo chamber. It blows my mind that overemployed people have become folk heroes. They're obviously not putting full effort into two jobs. I had the same experience as you with an "overemployed" person: Working with…
I think you just described most of the C level executives in the tech industry. They leave companies behind destroyed, with a big pay check. But it’s unethical if simple engineers do it. Sure.
Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
191–200 of 448 posts
Re: Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
#192Re: Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s called team building. You can believe in it or not. You can join a company that values that, or not.
Where is the line between team and cult? Cults are a subset of teams.
Both have implicit contracts, and a contract requires consideration on both sides. The parties define the value of the consideration, so you can have a junior cult member who feels they are getting good value for what they pay, or a SW dev at an insurance company who feels they don't. I also don't see much difference in your ability to affect your situation if you are unhappy with the current state.
Re: Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s also possible to “freeze” your employment history report just like you can freeze your credit report. Which prevents even companies with the wherewithal to do an employment history check from getting that information.
Interesting, how do to that "freeze"? I thought it's all data brokers I don't have any leverage on.
Re: Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
#195Related links that have been posted in other threads. Others? https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/03/who-is-soham-parekh-the-se... https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/man-goes-viral-working... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWMngMm3_88
Re: Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
#196I read through one of his emails. This guy is great at communicating his interest and signaling himself as a "high performer". Perhaps, he is also genuinely good at cracking these interviews. No wonder, he's been through so many of them.
Interviewing really is a distinct skill from contributing and the more people crank it the more it seems to test for interview ability.
Re: Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Tweet clearly says they fired in him the first week and confronted him about the lying/scamming. It seems very clear that they figured it out right away and confronted him about it.
But they haven't checked his employment eligibility or he wouldn't have started his first week.
Given that there's no oversight of the verification process, that can slide, too.
Re: Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
#198Re: Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
#199This is insane, there is a Reddit, of course there is, of almost 500K people, https://www.reddit.com/r/overemployed/ , who discuss all of the strategies to do this. Just imagine being one of the people who legit joins a startup, is passionate, working long hours, earning your vest, to have your coworker pretending to be working.
There are plenty of people employed at a single job who only pretend to work. That's life.
Re: Ask HN: How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
IME, employees are on committees and boards (though not public company boards all that often) all the time. The issue here taking multiple full time positions. A CEO being the CEO of multiple companies at once is not common, and when it does happen it tends to draw a lot of scrutiny. CEO is considered a full time job, showing up to a board meeting every quarter is not. The second part of this is disclosure, which was…
One particular CEO in the news is at the head of 3 companies
We can debate if the executive timeline is too short and that's what destroys companies, but I don't see how this is the same as an over-employed engineer who's spread too thin.