LooksMapping

Post by [deleted] » Fri, Jul 04, 2025, 10:48 AM UTC

brigandish wrote: post #37

preetsojitra wrote: post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're misinterpreting the analogy. - Drawing a mustache on the art = Vandalizing the original data (not what's happening). - Taking the art home = Deleting the original data (also not what's happening). - Scraping faces for an AI = Following visitors around the gallery, taking secret photos of them, and publishing a book that rates them by attractiveness. The fact that the gallery is "public" does not make that beha…

> taking secret photos of them, The visitors took the photo, supplied the photo, and put it in a public place.

Post by yapyap » Fri, Jul 04, 2025, 11:28 AM UTC

donatj wrote: post #21

This is some old internet style shenanigans powered by modern technology. I am here for it. I want more of this.

Post by erikig » Fri, Jul 04, 2025, 11:37 AM UTC

meindnoch wrote: post #24

What's the purpose of this? .pix { /* Simulate CRT pixelation and low resolution */ text-rendering: optimizeSpeed; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-smooth: never; -webkit-font-smoothing: none; -moz-osx-font-smoothing: grayscale; /* Simulate slight pixelation */ filter: blur(0.3px); color: black; font-size: 16px; }

Post by Dracophoenix » Fri, Jul 04, 2025, 12:24 PM UTC

jeauxlb wrote: post #28

gkbrk wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's all public pictures though. Why would I publish a picture of my face if I don't want people to have a picture of my face?

I can go into an art gallery but I may not touch the works. Often there aren't physical barriers but we all understand some behaviours are not acceptable. Similarly, publication of an image on the internet is not implicit permission to use it for any possible purpose, however technically feasible. For example, deepfakes.

Post by bemmu » Fri, Jul 04, 2025, 12:54 PM UTC