Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
1–10 of 366 posts
Re: Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
#2Re: Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
#3https://wellsfargo.bluematrix.com/docs/html/c42ca8a8-178f-40... | https://archive.today/BhC0n
Re: Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
#4https://wellsfargo.bluematrix.com/docs/html/c42ca8a8-178f-40... | https://archive.today/BhC0n
What in the bad-URL-looks-like-phishing-but-appears-legit heck is this?
Re: Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
#5Re: Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
#6Either way, "full employment" doesn't mean much unless you take into account whether people are actually able to live a stable lifestyle or are burning the candle at both ends just to put food on the table. One of these enables folks to buy nonessentials and fund all those sectors of the economy, the other doesn't.
Re: Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
#7We really need better ways of measuring economic health. I could lose my six-figure job, turn around, and get hired on as a server at Applebee's for minimum wage, and the "unemployment" rate would stay the same. Not to mention that it doesn't include those not actively looking for work. Either way, "full employment" doesn't mean much unless you take into account whether people are actually able to live a stable lifes…
Re: Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
#8We really need better ways of measuring economic health. I could lose my six-figure job, turn around, and get hired on as a server at Applebee's for minimum wage, and the "unemployment" rate would stay the same. Not to mention that it doesn't include those not actively looking for work. Either way, "full employment" doesn't mean much unless you take into account whether people are actually able to live a stable lifes…
It’s in the vested interest of leaders to control the narrative. That’s why we have/had so many regulations that prevent them from doing so.
Re: Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
#9We really need better ways of measuring economic health. I could lose my six-figure job, turn around, and get hired on as a server at Applebee's for minimum wage, and the "unemployment" rate would stay the same. Not to mention that it doesn't include those not actively looking for work. Either way, "full employment" doesn't mean much unless you take into account whether people are actually able to live a stable lifes…
"To be sure, the ADP report has a spotty track record on predicting the subsequent government jobs report, which investors tend to weigh more heavily."
The BLS does do several measures.
https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-une...
Their (BLS) news release also provides more detail.
Re: Private sector lost 33k jobs, badly missing expectations of 100k increase
#10We really need better ways of measuring economic health. I could lose my six-figure job, turn around, and get hired on as a server at Applebee's for minimum wage, and the "unemployment" rate would stay the same. Not to mention that it doesn't include those not actively looking for work. Either way, "full employment" doesn't mean much unless you take into account whether people are actually able to live a stable lifes…
And that is before we talk about alternative signals like the ADP number this like references.
Anytime someone says “we need better ways” you should just read it as “I should do more reading”, because this is a very well studied, understood and measured set of data.