I already created a neurosymbolic code generator. Based on bench marks it received a score of 99 percent.
SymbolicAI: A neuro-symbolic perspective on LLMs
61–66 of 66 posts
Re: SymbolicAI: A neuro-symbolic perspective on LLMs
#62I already created a neurosymbolic code generator. Based on bench marks it received a score of 99 percent.
Re: SymbolicAI: A neuro-symbolic perspective on LLMs
#63It's called a type system.
What you need for this is a more expressive type system.
Re: SymbolicAI: A neuro-symbolic perspective on LLMs
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for bringing this up. I'm fairly familiar with Peirce's triadic semiotics and Montague's semantics, and they show up in some of my notes. I haven't turned those sketches into anything applied yet, but the design space feels *huge* and quite promising intuitively.
Agreed. This is a very interesting discussion! Thanks for bringing it to light. Have you read Escher, Bach, Gödel: the Eternal Golden Braid?
Re: SymbolicAI: A neuro-symbolic perspective on LLMs
#65How did you sort out mapping python constructs to their semantic equivalents? I hope you keep at this, you may be in the right place at the right time. It's getting to the point where some of the LLMs are immediately just giving me answers in Python, which is a strong indication of what the future will look like with Agents.
I'm struggling to understand the question. I'll revisit this when I wake up since it's quite late here.