Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Business.txt - Standard Proposal

github.com

31–40 of 115 posts

Re: Show HN: Business.txt - Standard Proposal

#31
post #25

Regardless of the format of the content, I think that it'd be nice if files like this would be placed in /.well-known/[standard] in accordance with http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785 There are already too many magical files cluttering up the root.

Is it being implemented? I mean, I can find http://www.ietf.org/robots.txt but not http://www.ietf.org/.well-known/robots.txt

Re: Show HN: Business.txt - Standard Proposal

#32
post #31
post #25

Regardless of the format of the content, I think that it'd be nice if files like this would be placed in /.well-known/[standard] in accordance with http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785 There are already too many magical files cluttering up the root.

Is it being implemented? I mean, I can find http://www.ietf.org/robots.txt but not http://www.ietf.org/.well-known/robots.txt

It's supposed to be used by newer specifications, not change existing ones like robots.txt. That would create too many problems with existing applications.

Re: Show HN: Business.txt - Standard Proposal

#33
post #22

Great idea. Added one for our company. It took just a couple of minutes. http://pierlis.com/business.txt

My browser is failing to render the address properly, it reads as "Poissonnière" so the diaresis is breaking. Probably need to double-check how you serve the file, and make sure the charset and encoding match.

Yeah, '; charset=utf-8' has to be appended to the Content-Type header.

Re: Show HN: Business.txt - Standard Proposal

#34

Great idea. Added one for our company. It took just a couple of minutes. http://pierlis.com/business.txt

"It took just a couple of minutes."

This is why I like the business.txt idea. Microformats or microdata, however appropriate and simple, are still one level of abstraction above this idea.

I came to this post 45 seconds ago, looked at GH, and could explain what this is for and how it works. That's saying something.

Re: Show HN: Business.txt - Standard Proposal

#35
post #6
post #3

Wouldn't it be easier if this were XML instead of plain text? I assume the goal is that software can easily interpret the data.

We want to be a human friendly file. If we had a JSON or XML file, it would be too complicated for a non-developer to write or read it. On this way, I think it doesn't matter if the website is done in wordpress, drupla, static files, flash, etc. It's just a simple file. Also, we are following the same pattern as the robots.txt file.

I would strongly suggest e.g. JSON or XML - if you can upload a website, the chance are that you could also create something like this. There would of course also be a template where absolute noobs could fill in the details and get correct output. With our current tools, implementing a clear text data storage seems like a pretty stupid idea - everyone would have to implement their own parsing. With e.g. JSON, there are libraries for every language and it has validation.

Re: Show HN: Business.txt - Standard Proposal

#36
Now we need a reviews.txt so that we don't need to give control of the reviews to less than trustworthy parties.

I propose:

  [company/product name] (URL)
  score: X/Y
  [review text]
  --
  [next review...]
E.g.:

  Frank's Pizza Place (http://franks.geocities.com)
  score: 8/10
  Good service and food. Doesn't accept credit cards.

Re: Show HN: Business.txt - Standard Proposal

#37
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My browser is failing to render the address properly, it reads as "Poissonnière" so the diaresis is breaking. Probably need to double-check how you serve the file, and make sure the charset and encoding match.

Yeah, '; charset=utf-8' has to be appended to the Content-Type header.

... which shouldn't be "too complicated for a non-developer", rite?

i'd prefer schema.org (or json equivalent). and a gui editor for less technical person.

Re: Show HN: Business.txt - Standard Proposal

#38
post #4

I think this usecase is already covered very well by microformats and the various metadata standards that already exist and are supported by Google, Facebook et al. I'm not sure the argument that these are too complicated for non-developers really works here, after all uploading a file to the root of a web directory is likely also too complicated...

Not to mention that the text file is invisible to the business owner, who inevitably would forget about it.
Post reply on HN