Good. Another point to be made when my friends push me to install bloated spyware just to plan a pizza party. Use Signal.
[flagged]
WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
21–30 of 161 posts
Re: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
#22Government: Zuck put a backdoor in WhatsApp or we will put you in a blacksite UFC ring and beat you up. Also Government: WhatsApp has a backdoor. Don't use it.
>Government: Zuck put a backdoor in WhatsApp or we will put you in a blacksite UFC ring and beat you up. Source? >Also Government: WhatsApp has a backdoor. Don't use it. If "zuck" is really in the pocket of the US government, why should they worry about their own backdoors?
It's the most hilarious thing about backdoors or collecting extensive covert intel on your own population, that any failure of opsec makes it much easier for all your adversaries to also spy on them in ways they would never otherwise be able to, then compromise them, and flip them.
Re: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
That wasn't signal's fault. They accidentally invited a journalist to the chat.
I agree in principle but this was (probably) a result of somebody fat-fingering the wrong contact and I do think there's some culpability on either the app or the phone for making that possible to do by mistake. Touch screens are an inherently clumsy interface, and Android in general has a lot of problems with UI elements suddenly moving around without warning as you're clicking on things. And then there's auto corre…
Re: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
That wasn't signal's fault. They accidentally invited a journalist to the chat.
I agree in principle but this was (probably) a result of somebody fat-fingering the wrong contact and I do think there's some culpability on either the app or the phone for making that possible to do by mistake. Touch screens are an inherently clumsy interface, and Android in general has a lot of problems with UI elements suddenly moving around without warning as you're clicking on things. And then there's auto corre…
Supposedly, it was the result of a helpful Apple feature getting the wrong phone number for one of the intended group participants. Then Signal cheerfully used that wrong phone number to add the reporter to the group.
* https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/06/signal-group...
Re: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
#25Re: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
#26This is due to the addition of Meta AI in WhatsApp [0]. Unsurprisingly, data egress to third parties is a major security vector - especially for mission critical jobs like working in the House. MS apps incorporating Copilot have faced similar blocks as well. This requirement for data stewardship is called out in HITPOL8 as well [1][2] (the AI tool standards set by the House CAO). [0] - https://faq.whatsapp.com/203220…
Re: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
#27Go on...
Re: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
#28Government: Zuck put a backdoor in WhatsApp or we will put you in a blacksite UFC ring and beat you up. Also Government: WhatsApp has a backdoor. Don't use it.
WhatsApp on TV: “Trust us! It’s encrypted :) :) :)”
Re: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
#29Government: Zuck put a backdoor in WhatsApp or we will put you in a blacksite UFC ring and beat you up. Also Government: WhatsApp has a backdoor. Don't use it.
>Government: Zuck put a backdoor in WhatsApp or we will put you in a blacksite UFC ring and beat you up. Source? >Also Government: WhatsApp has a backdoor. Don't use it. If "zuck" is really in the pocket of the US government, why should they worry about their own backdoors?
Re: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
He did say last year he was going to make this the most open and transparent administration in US history. What other administration would grant a hostile journalist an inside look at the planning and execution of an airstrike? Promises made, promises kept.