21–30 of 43 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I am scared that this is vibe coded Totally serious question: would you feel better about this piece of software, if you didn't know that it was vibe coded? Do we need "build without AI" stickers on every piece of software created these days?
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That kind of goes counter to semantic versioning, where: - x.y.Z (patch) -> backward compatible bug fixes - x.Y.z (minor) -> backward compatible new features - X.y.z (major) -> breaking changes But of course it's fine to use whatever versioning scheme you like, as long as you communicate it to your consumers. https://semver.org/ Edit: updated the version strings for clarity.
Minor note, but since the topic is accurate semvar: rule 4 specifies 0.x.y is a special case where anything may change at any time.
I am scared that this is vibe coded and not audited in any way. tsnet is good software, but wrapping it in this way is a recipe for disaster. Please reconsider.
> I am scared that this is vibe coded Totally serious question: would you feel better about this piece of software, if you didn't know that it was vibe coded? Do we need "build without AI" stickers on every piece of software created these days?
Yes, I think projects that are coded wholly or in part by LLMs should be noted as such.
As in, I cannot simply sign up with my own personal identifiers (email, phone, etc.) but need to participate in a google auth or FB auth mechanism ?
I found it hard to believe - is this, indeed, the case ?
This is why you don't let Claude handle versioning and the release process. From v0.1.0 to v1.0.0 to v2.0.0, and then suddenly 1.2.0? Semantic versioning isn't quantum mechanics. (Even then, I'll admit it's sometimes hard for me too to decide the right increment when tagging versions. :)
Tangential ... I think I read somewhere that I cannot become a customer of tailscale without FAANG credentials ? As in, I cannot simply sign up with my own personal identifiers (email, phone, etc.) but need to participate in a google auth or FB auth mechanism ? I found it hard to believe - is this, indeed, the case ?
Google, Microsoft, Github, Apple or your own OIDC Provider.
They do not have their own account backend.
So you dont technically need a FAANG account if you have a Gitea, Gitlab, Authentik Account or something like that.
Tangential ... I think I read somewhere that I cannot become a customer of tailscale without FAANG credentials ? As in, I cannot simply sign up with my own personal identifiers (email, phone, etc.) but need to participate in a google auth or FB auth mechanism ? I found it hard to believe - is this, indeed, the case ?
Tangential ... I think I read somewhere that I cannot become a customer of tailscale without FAANG credentials ? As in, I cannot simply sign up with my own personal identifiers (email, phone, etc.) but need to participate in a google auth or FB auth mechanism ? I found it hard to believe - is this, indeed, the case ?
It's a weird process and not particularly user friendly (passkey accounts are tied to a specific passkey and can't have additional ones added, so you need to create a new account if you, say, migrate from one hardware key to another). Hopefully they improve the process before passkey support goes out of beta.
Anytime I've submitted with both url + body the body is posted as a comment.
Meta question: How does a HN post like this come to exist with _both_ a link and a body? Anytime I've submitted with both url + body the body is posted as a comment.
