Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
81–90 of 248 posts
Re: Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
#82Re: Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know counting calories by taking a picture literally doesn't work right? In fact, I'd argue it's one of the best examples of when an LLM confidently feeds you misinformation. An obvious example, a chicken breast fried in oil and a chicken breast air fried look identical, yet the oil fried one would have 3-4x the calories at least. Don't take my work for it though - this was just on HN the other day: https://news.…
What happens if you give it that context though? Or prompt it to search the web for comparable meals?
I can just hit a search engine and say "number of calories in X" and get a precise answer with 2 seconds of calculator math.
If I have to take a picture, send it to ai, but then amend it with "This is air fried chicken, it weighs x, it's a breast cut. I didn't add salt."
Why do all that when a single search will give me the answer I want without the picture upload or context?
Re: Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know counting calories by taking a picture literally doesn't work right? In fact, I'd argue it's one of the best examples of when an LLM confidently feeds you misinformation. An obvious example, a chicken breast fried in oil and a chicken breast air fried look identical, yet the oil fried one would have 3-4x the calories at least. Don't take my work for it though - this was just on HN the other day: https://news.…
I agree in principle, but I'll say that the number of calories are likely not 3-4x. The 3-4x number is for deep frying chicken. You usually don't do that if you aren't also breading the chicken. A pan-fried chicken with a little oil in the pan to avoid sticking/make better thermal contact will add calories but not 3-4x more. You're likely using about 1 tbsp of oil which is around 100 kcal. 100g of chicken has around…
Re: Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
#85Re: Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
#86One thing that would be super nice, make the back button and forward button work. Its really tempting to want to hit the back button when you select equipment, click next, and realized you missed one.
Re: Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
#87Re: Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
#88Am not sure what your data source is, but l run the following: - https://wrkout.xyz/ (exercise database api with images and videos) - https://github.com/wrkout/exercises.json (open source exercise dataset) If they are of any interest / help
For this, i rebuilt the entire dataset from scratch with a partner to avoid any licensing ambiguity (especially with videos), and to have full control over attributes, translations, etc.
But I absolutely love seeing other open projects in this space and I'd be happy to explore possible synergies if it can help both communities.
DMs open !
Re: Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
#89Re: Show HN: Workout.cool – Open-source fitness coaching platform
#90It would be great if the equipment and muscle selection wasn't mandatory. For example, I have a pull-up bar but I have no idea what muscles I can train with it. Why not let me filter on beginner exercises instead?
I'm already planning to make the filters optional, and add things like "beginner-friendly", "popular exercises", "calisthetics", ...
Thanks for pointing it out