Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
techcrunch.com
Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
1–10 of 372 posts
Re: Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
#2"No across the board. Not a single [patent] proven invalid by Samsung."
that's big.
edit: "Damages from Apple to Samsung: zero." (edit2: oops, dumb typo)
Re: Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
#3From: http://live.theverge.com/apple-samsung-verdict-live/ "No across the board. Not a single [patent] proven invalid by Samsung." that's big. edit: "Damages from Apple to Samsung: zero." (edit2: oops, dumb typo)
Re: Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
#4Here is the jury according to techcrunch
1. An electrical engineer 2. A homemaker 3. A construction worker 4. A young unemployed man who likes video games 5. An insurance agent 6. An ex-Navy avionics technician 7. A store operations manager for a cycling retailer 8. A project manager for wireless carrier AT&T 9. A benefits and payroll manager who works with startups
http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/21/apple-samsung/
Only in America?? And how many of those people are biased because they just love Steve Jobs and Apple products. I know for sure, my mom loves her Mac and she wouldn't think twice who is right and who is wrong in this case.
Re: Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
#5Re: Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
#6Re: Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
#7I was shocked to learn this case is basically being decided by people who have no idea what they are really deciding on. Here is the jury according to techcrunch 1. An electrical engineer 2. A homemaker 3. A construction worker 4. A young unemployed man who likes video games 5. An insurance agent 6. An ex-Navy avionics technician 7. A store operations manager for a cycling retailer 8. A project manager for wireless c…
Re: Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
#8I was shocked to learn this case is basically being decided by people who have no idea what they are really deciding on. Here is the jury according to techcrunch 1. An electrical engineer 2. A homemaker 3. A construction worker 4. A young unemployed man who likes video games 5. An insurance agent 6. An ex-Navy avionics technician 7. A store operations manager for a cycling retailer 8. A project manager for wireless c…
Re: Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
#9From: http://live.theverge.com/apple-samsung-verdict-live/ "No across the board. Not a single [patent] proven invalid by Samsung." that's big. edit: "Damages from Apple to Samsung: zero." (edit2: oops, dumb typo)
I haven't followed the case closely and leaving aside whether or not Samsung copied from Apple, we just all lost.
Were there not a few prior art arguments and all that? Samsung couldn't invalidate any of those?!
This is depressing.
Re: Apple Wins Patent Ruling As Jury Finds Samsung Infringes
#10You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that Samsung made their products to look like Apple products. They changed their icon styles and other UI elements away from Android standards to match the Apple style.
Some of the things Apple invented and patented on like pinch to zoom and so on Samsung used or copied via Android and or their own UI skin on top of Android.
You just have to look at Windows Phone 7 or Windows 8 or Web OS or Blackberry to realize that you don't have to copy Apple to make a good or great smartphone. Samsung is much closer with the Galaxy S3, too bad they are still cranking out iPad clones with the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and the like.