Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the effects on software development is: the fact that you submitted a PR with any LoC count doesn't mean that you did any work. You need to explain your solution and answer questions to prove that.
The next stage of this issue is: how do you explain something you didn't write? The LLM-optimist view at the moment, which takes on board the need to review LLMs, assumes that this review capability will exist. I cannot review LLM output on areas outside of my expertise. I cannot develop the expertise I need if I use an LLM in-the-large. I first encountered this issue ~year-ago when using an LLM to prototype a progra…
Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
201–210 of 442 posts
Re: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
#202It feels, more and more, that LLMs will be another technology that society will inoculate itself against. It's already starting to happen in education: teachers conversing with students, observing them learn, observing them demonstrate their skills. In business, quickly I'd say, we will realise that the vast majority of worthwhile communication necessarily must be produced by people -- as authors of what they want to…
Re: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
#203It feels, more and more, that LLMs will be another technology that society will inoculate itself against. It's already starting to happen in education: teachers conversing with students, observing them learn, observing them demonstrate their skills. In business, quickly I'd say, we will realise that the vast majority of worthwhile communication necessarily must be produced by people -- as authors of what they want to…
> I'd say, we will realise that the vast majority of worthwhile communication necessarily must be produced by people Now one like me might go and ask how much of communication is actually worthwhile? Sometimes I consider that there is lot of communication that might not actually be. It is still done, but if no one actually reads it, why not automate generation. Not to say there is not significant amount of stuff you…
There's a tremendous hollowing-out of our mental capacities caused by the computer science framing of activities in terms of input->output, as-if the point is to obtain the output "by any means".
It would not matter if the LLM gave exactly the same output as you had written, and always did. Because you still have to act in the world with thoughts that you needed have when authoring it.
Re: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'd say, we will realise that the vast majority of worthwhile communication necessarily must be produced by people Now one like me might go and ask how much of communication is actually worthwhile? Sometimes I consider that there is lot of communication that might not actually be. It is still done, but if no one actually reads it, why not automate generation. Not to say there is not significant amount of stuff you…
It's not about getting it right, its about having thought about it. Authoring means thinking-thru, owning, etc. There's a tremendous hollowing-out of our mental capacities caused by the computer science framing of activities in terms of input->output, as-if the point is to obtain the output "by any means". It would not matter if the LLM gave exactly the same output as you had written, and always did. Because you stil…
Re: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
#205Well... yes? Essays are tools to force students to structure and communicate thinking - production of the essay forces the thinking. If you want an equivalent result from LLMs you're going to need a much more iterative process of critique and iteration to get the same kind of mental effort out of students. We haven't designed that process yet.
I mean, they found brain atrophy. If this doesn't get someone worried, I don't know what would. I joked that "I don't do drugs" when someone asked me whether I played MMORPGs, but this joke becomes just too real when we apply it to generative AI of any soırt.
Where did you get that from? While the article mentions the word "atrophy" twice, it's not something that they found. They just saw less neural activation in regards to essay writing in those people who didn't write the essay themselves. I don't anything there in regards to the brain as a whole.
Re: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
#206I worry about the adverse effects of LLM on already disfranchised populations - you know the poor etc - that usually would have to pull themselves up using hard work etc studying n reading hard. now if you don't have a mentor to tell you in the age of LLM you still have to do things the hard / old school way to develop critical thinking - you might end up taking shortcuts and have the LLMs "think" for you. hence agai…
If you are rich, you can afford a good mentor. (That's true literally, in the sense of being rich in money and paying for a mentor. But also more metaphorically for people rich in connections and other resources.)
If you are poor, you used to be out of luck. But now everyone can afford a nearly-free mentor in the form of an LLM. Of course, at the moment the LLM-mentor is still below the best human mentors. But remember: only rich people can afford these. The alternative for poor people was essentially nothing.
And AI systems are only improving.
Re: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
#207I think we need to shift our idea of what LLMs do and stop thinking they are ‘thinking’ in any human way. The best mental description I have come up with is they are “Concept Processors”. Which is still awesome. Computers couldn’t understand concepts before. And now they can, and they can process and transform them in really interesting and amazing ways. You can transform the concept of ‘a website that does X’ into c…
Re: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
#208It feels, more and more, that LLMs will be another technology that society will inoculate itself against. It's already starting to happen in education: teachers conversing with students, observing them learn, observing them demonstrate their skills. In business, quickly I'd say, we will realise that the vast majority of worthwhile communication necessarily must be produced by people -- as authors of what they want to…
I read that article when it was posted on HN, and it's full of bad faith interpretations of the various objections to using LLM-assisted coding.
Given that the article comes from a person whose expertise and viewpoints I respected, I had to run it through a friend; who suggested a more cynical interpretation that the article might have been written to serve his selfish interests. Given the number of bugs that LLMs often put in, it's not difficult to see why a skilled security researcher might be willing to encourage people to generate code in ways that lead to cognitive atrophy, and therefore increase his business through security audits.
Re: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
#209Well... yes? Essays are tools to force students to structure and communicate thinking - production of the essay forces the thinking. If you want an equivalent result from LLMs you're going to need a much more iterative process of critique and iteration to get the same kind of mental effort out of students. We haven't designed that process yet.
I mean, they found brain atrophy. If this doesn't get someone worried, I don't know what would. I joked that "I don't do drugs" when someone asked me whether I played MMORPGs, but this joke becomes just too real when we apply it to generative AI of any soırt.
I thought WoW was an off-label contraceptive?
Re: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
#210"...the LLM group's participants performed worse than their counterparts in the Brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, scoring." That's not surprising but also bleak.