Live data from Hacker News

Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

voxelmanip.se

161–170 of 172 posts

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This blink is in a specific UI XML dialect, not HTML.

True, it has never been in an HTML standard, however it was definitely a documented part of early HTML. The blink element was in Netscape Navigator's HTML dialect in 1993/94, when early HTML was still just hitting IETF RFCs / DRAFTs, you can find blink in the Netscape HTML developer documentation from just after that era, DevEdge. It was never in NCSA Mosaic, the other big GUI browser of the era. Later on in the proc…

Blink shows that the webs often touted absolute backwards compatibility can be broken for really petty reasons.

At least these days you can easily bring back the fun:

  blink {
    animation: blink 1s steps(5, start) infinite;
  }
  @keyframes blink { to { visibility: hidden } }

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#162
post #108

Notice how pretty much none of these are added in the last 10 years? Android's become 'more mature' - ie. Boring, and the joke to code ratio is dropping rapidly.

If you're 10 hours into debugging something, or you're swamped with a horde of bug reports and bad reviews, and after digging in you find the bug is in upstream code laced with humor, it comes off as if upstream isn't serious about software development or is making light of the responsibility. Lots of things start small, but X11, Android, etc etc are now used by millions, in lots of different situations, and humor is…

Sounds like a problem for outrage culture grumps, not something people having fun with their code should care about.

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#163
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that's a big line between people who work as software engineers becuase they enjoy the work and want to build something and folks who go there to punch the ticket and run back home as soon as possible. The second group doesn't want to deal with "all the fun crap" and "distractions" that stand in the way of them marking a bug fixed (or, god forbid, actually getting extra bugs/work assigned because some "fun" c…

Things that seem fun when they are written are often not much so a few years later, without the initial context, when trying to actually "build something". Fun is good when it is fresh. Fossilized fun is not that fun. It is more like that uncle who heavily tries to be fun at family parties.

A dog walked into a tavern and said, 'I can't see a thing. I'll open this one'.

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#164
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good, I hate ‘funny’ code. Just get to the point, I’m not here for someone’s notionally hilarious inside joke from 18 years ago.

I am in this camp as well. Even worse are cute error messages. If software actually worked, then I'd be fine with more whimsy. But it doesn't, so I'm not.

The cute error messages are annoying because they hide what actually happened, not because they are trying to be funny. They are also usually not the result of a single developer's whimsy like a proper easter egg is so they end up being as "funny" as a shitty sitcom with a forced laugh track.

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#165
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good, I hate ‘funny’ code. Just get to the point, I’m not here for someone’s notionally hilarious inside joke from 18 years ago.

It's even worse when you stumble upon a repo with already poor documentation, only to find it filled with silly jokes e.g. "You thought this would be easy, right? Well, that's what X thought too, but..." yeah, leave the storytelling aside please.

You can always ask for a refund.

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#166
post #2

How is someone writing an article about Android source code node nerdy enough to know what a Tricoder is? I don’t buy it

My fellow old person, Deep Space Nine came out 32 years ago. It's not something the nerds of today need to know. All these great sources of nerd allusions will be lost in time, like tears in rain.

You are aware that there a number of contemporary star trek movies and tv-series (as much as I wish they wouldn't exist), right?

Besides, real nerds very much are into older media and not just current pop culture. Which is why things like trek (and blade runner for that matter) end up getting sequels - because there is an audience for it.

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you sure? I'm Italian and we had Star Trek (all the films, all the shows, many of the books), and apparently the Star Trek Italian Club[0] was funded in 1982. I think Spock and Kirk were quite familiar to most people, and for sure as a nerd in the '00s everybody understood the joke of showing Bill Gates as a Borg on Slashdot. [0] https://stic.it/

> , and for sure as a nerd in the '00s everybody understood the joke of showing Bill Gates as a Borg on Slashdot. Everybody, Gates and Slashdot in one sentence.

There is a reason it was called the slashdot effect, because it was the biggest source of traffic for many sites it linked.

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#168
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With the benefit of hindsight, I'd say that impression is more because every series is very different. TOS and TAS may have been similar to TNG seasons 1 and 2, but TNG got more thoughtful as it went on; DS9 was a very different show to both TOS and TNG, with long-term continuity and changes (beyond casting) that stuck, and far more shades of grey and where outright evil came with a smile and a charismatic speech rat…

I think that while each show was different, all the Star Trek shows from TOS to VOY had a certain feel to them that made them feel consistent. Yes TOS was more swashbuckling and DS9 was more interested in continuity and shades of grey, but they all were similar in that they were thoughtful shows where teams of competent professionals solved problems in the context of a generally positive vision for humanity, all whil…

> Where we once got stories where the writers were smart enough to let viewers draw their own conclusions and apply them to real life (mostly, there were preachy episodes too), the modern shows are a blatant soapbox for the writers to preach to us about their views on the world.

This is really the main thing wrong with almost all modern entertainment - writers won't let you analyze anything themselves for fear that you will come to the "wrong" conclusions.

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#169
post #2

How is someone writing an article about Android source code node nerdy enough to know what a Tricoder is? I don’t buy it

Not every nerdy person is into Star Trek? Star Wars is imo way more mainstream than Star Trek these days (especially with Disney pumping it), but even then there are tons of people in their 20s working in tech who haven’t seen it and have no interest in it. I don’t think there was more than one person on my previous Android team who would’ve gotten the Tricoder reference, and I was the youngest person there (29 years…

You don't really need to be into Star Trek to know what a tricorder is (or at least have heard the term) any more than you need to be into Star Wars to know what a lightsaber is.

Re: Jokes and Humour in the Public Android API

#170
post #61

[flagged]

Makes you wonder if there are little easter eggs in e.g. missile control firmware.

Haven't written that but have done stuff similar in customer (which is public). I've had code shipped without me knowing. That certainly had such things left in. I've also had code shipped with plenty of reviews to take out all Easter eggs, debug menus, etc.
Post reply on HN