Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you think billionaires became billionaires? How can you extract a billion dollars of wealth in your life time, or even several generations? Certainly not by creating value. Almost certainly by destroying something else, privatising the profits and socialising the losses. E.g. mining, commercial fishing. Etc. We will never see billionairs act as a force for good because the current system only allows for evil t…
Not sure why you're being downvoted, because you're absolutely right.
David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
101–110 of 187 posts
Re: David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
The human population is set to crash quite hard in the next 100 years. It's backed into the cake.
Not all human population is going to crash. Africa population in 1950 was 228.7 million, in 2025 is 1549 million. Fertility rate in 2025 is 4.05. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/afr/afr...
https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/afr/afr...
most projections expect Africa's population to peak around 2070, which is less than the timeframe GP considered.
Re: David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure why you're being downvoted, because you're absolutely right.
The current top-10 billionaires on Forbes' list all got rich by creating value, though some like Larry Ellison certainly did both.
Re: David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
#104Re: David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
When somebody says something isn't that dangerous it always comes with an unstated post-text of 'for an average person of average health.' Each year the flu kills hundreds of thousands of people. As the population ages, and thus has more individuals in senescence where your body is basically just breaking down, that will increase into the millions. But yet it's still not unreasonable to say that the flu isn't that da…
Well, maybe search for the keyword "long COVID" and see how it has caused a lot of suffering even among young and otherwise healthy individuals. Also, people seem to forget that exponentials go up very fast, so an "average person of average health" would be very selfish to not make the necessary precautions to limit the spread of the virus as much as feasible.
The only virus completely eliminated by vaccines is small pox, and that was largely because of a number of ideal factors. The top two are probably that that no animals carried smallpox, only humans. And the second is that infection or vaccination provided lifetime immunity of effectively 100%. This dramatically reduced its potential for mutation and meant that getting rid of it in humans would get rid of it - period.
Coronaviruses, by contrast, are transmissible between humans and animals. This means even if you fully eliminated it in humans, it could, and probably would, come back. This is why flus are basically impossible to get rid of. If you believe CDC numbers then US flu deaths in 2020 were essentially 0, yet now it's back like nothing ever happened. Even the Spanish Flu is still with us as a variant of the common flu. But fortunately most viruses trend towards less lethal mutations over time. Probably natural selection in play - killing your host is not a great path to survival and reproduction.
As for long COVID. I'd rather defer that conversation for a few years. Research on exactly what it is and exactly what causes it is ongoing, and so debating it at this point is just going to be speculation.
Re: David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure why you're being downvoted, because you're absolutely right.
The current top-10 billionaires on Forbes' list all got rich by creating value, though some like Larry Ellison certainly did both.
I would also argue that they don't create the value themselves, but their workers do. Just like that joke: a worker is admiring the boss's Ferrari, and the boss tells him "if you continue working hard, next year I'll have 2"
Re: David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure why you're being downvoted, because you're absolutely right.
[flagged]
Re: David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Greenpeace used to drop boulders into the ocean to prevent bottom trawling circa 2021-2022. Unsure if they still do. Fairly straightforward to solve for if you’re willing to drop chunks of rock (granite, non reactive) or concrete in the ocean at the right spots. Bans are nice, destructive force against adversaries works better though. Hard to take the selfish out of the human, so you have to engineer systems accordin…
I think it would be a great PR idea for a billionaire to buy a few old ships and use them to drop rocks over the most popular/vulnerable fishing grounds. What happened to rich people who were all not evil?
Re: David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure why you're being downvoted, because you're absolutely right.
The current top-10 billionaires on Forbes' list all got rich by creating value, though some like Larry Ellison certainly did both.
Do not treat it like the real list of world's richest people
Re: David Attenborough at 99: 'I will not see how the story ends'
#110The part comparing bottom trawling to bulldozing underwater forests was powerful. But the recovery of sea otters and whales gives some hope.