For a completely unrelated use case, I've started using it as my docx viewer on Linux, and so far it's been great (and solves one of my pain points moving from MacOS).
Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
81–90 of 171 posts
Re: Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
#82Speaking of, could we start using version control for keeping track of laws and updating old laws? It seems to me like a much better system than randomly burying in a new law that it strikes out some text from an old law.
Re: Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
#83Re: Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
#84I think there's a lot of money to be made in this arena, especially given that LLMs are much easier to integrate with plain text files than with Word documents.
[1]: https://hiandrewquinn.github.io/til-site/posts/things-word-h...
Re: Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
#85I wish developers would think more as users and not “what would I like” more. I’m also pretty sure that I could count on one hand the number of lawyers that use Linux for any legal work.
There have been a few attempts to use diffing to solve redlining, you should look into why they have failed.
Re: Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
#86I wonder if textbooks and papers could be easier to understand if they had a "go to definition" functionality for technical jargon, notation, or reasoning.
Shame is that monetization around them is even more exploitative than normal textbooks. You don't own them, so you can't keep or resell them once you're done, and you typically lose access to it about a week after the class ends. Many courses also issue assignments and grades through the e-textbook, so you're forced to buy it at a price they decide. Fortunately work reimbursed mine.
Re: Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
#87My pottery teacher runs a law firm though, I’ll show it to her. Do you know if there are many differences in workflow or terminology between the US and UK?
Re: Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
#88But it’s a general principle: the more you are implementing from scratch, the more of a mess you’re likely to be in. As one example, at IME is completely broken, completely preventing a lot of non-English usage. Even my Compose key is broken: the key sequence `Compose - >` should produce →, but instead produces “Compose->”. This is the first time I’ve seen the Compose key turn into the word “Compose”!
For serious desktop-style applications, I honestly recommend that you not use plain-Rust GUI just yet. It is definitely steadily getting there, and I’m very optimistic that there will be at least two reasonable choices available within three years, but it’s still not where I’d want it to be for an app like this yet. Web browsers are, unfortunately, typically the pragmatic choice, even for desktop-only apps.
Re: Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
#89If you want people to use it on the web: do not under any circumstances use the pure-canvas approach. You must use real DOM, or it will be an endless frustration that turns many people away. I’ve written about the problems quite a few times, look through https://hn.algolia.com/?type=comment&query=chrismorgan+pure+... if you’re interested. If you’re not intending it to be used via the web, don’t worry. But it’s a gene…
There are issues solved by the DOM for sure, but it requires shipping an entire web browser, and this product is a dedicated word processor. I’d rather face those issues head-on than defer to someone else’s implementation of such a core aspect. I know IME is broken, and Tritium’s really only able to address the needs of the happy path at the moment, but if can do that well, then there’s a business model to fund solving the edge cases to bring a real Word competitor to the desktop for lawyers.
Re: Show HN: Tritium – The Legal IDE in Rust
#90IANAL but this looks great! Congrats :) My pottery teacher runs a law firm though, I’ll show it to her. Do you know if there are many differences in workflow or terminology between the US and UK?