[flagged]
I'd argue that the tax cuts aren't as useful as nasa
121–130 of 420 posts
[flagged]
I'd argue that the tax cuts aren't as useful as nasa
Wherever budget cuts are proposed, you can rely upon detractors to present the issue in apocalyptic terms. If we believed all of these claims, then it would be impossible to cut the scope of government spending. Furthermore, if we accepted the premise promoted by some commenters here, then research, which is presented as incredibly valuable - would be unable to be funded or valued in the private market. For these rea…
Despite becoming insular and retreating to being a hermit nation, already outrageous military spending is increasing by $100B+. Add a few trillion in tax cuts for the mega rich.
In the context of those things, dismissing the harm to NASA, with its relatively tiny budget, seems absolutely perverse.
[flagged]
DoD budget was $850 billions.
Just saying...
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
It's all a tradeoff, will we get a better future from these nasa projects, or from spending the money on the currently planned tax cut extentions? I'd argue that the tax cuts aren't as useful as nasa
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, let’s start having Californians not have to pay federal taxes. I genuinely am not joking, if the govt wants to go this direction then let’s welcome states rights to keep their money within their borders.
It wouldn't actually be a big deal. Some states would win a little and some would lose a little but it wouldn't be life changing for anyone. The cents on the dollar in and out flows fluctuate a lot year to year. The bigger problem is that damn near every state bureaucracy has forgotten how to actually write and evaluate their own damn rules for all sorts of expenditures that are currently spec'd out on a "follow fed…
This doesn’t imply that the net flows average out to zero.
[flagged]
[flagged]