Live data from Hacker News

My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

appaddict.app

131–140 of 218 posts

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Second Little Snitch. > NOTE: Corporate IT departments no likee Little Snitch.

Do you have a story to tell us?

I don't have a story but Little Snitch is the kind of tool most corporate users don't need, but that many malicious actors love to use. Sort of like running nmap on your computer, yeah there are legitimate reasons to do so, but you will get a call from IT if you try it.

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#132
post #116
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you think push should work? Any push service works this way. The client contacts the server to be updated. The server gives a no data or a data response. The server cannot magically contact the client.

What do you think the word "push" means in the word "push"? It doesn't mean "pull", btw.

You're arguing semantics over a phrase that was decided upon 20 years ago. It's too late.

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#133
post #34

Little Snitch can detect and block connections at the process level. https://www.obdev.at/products/littlesnitch/index.html

that works in a lot of cases, but unfortunately it seems sometimes you get these popups about nsurlsessiond (for example) where you know where the connection goes, but no idea where it comes from (especially if it's trying to connect to to some generic AWS hostname)

And as much as you can use little snitch for programs you install, these days it seems an endless whack-a-mole to block Apple's stuff as there's so many requests all the time. The more time goes by, the more it seems that the concept of "personal" computer is gone: there's nothing "personal" about it anymore, it's the computer plus an amorphous blob of online services one has no control over.

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microsoft put ads in their OS menus. Kindof a stretch to "both sides" this one.

Apple does too! Drives me crazy, although it’s not nearly as bad as Windows.

I have never seen this. What ads are you referring to in MacOS?

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microsoft put ads in their OS menus. Kindof a stretch to "both sides" this one.

No it isn't. The context is telemetry and spying, not built in advertising.

And none of the items in the original thread post were about telemetry. They were about functional requirements.

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microsoft put ads in their OS menus. Kindof a stretch to "both sides" this one.

Apple does too! Drives me crazy, although it’s not nearly as bad as Windows.

Uh…where?

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But at least they have E2E encryption. The whole point of which is not having the key to.

The whole point is that a 3rd party (Apple) doesn’t have the key. It’s not real E2E and it’s still susceptible to government overreach.

Still need your password to use the key

Re: My Mac contacted 63 different Apple owned domains in an hour, while not is use

#139
post #92

Polling domains when attached to the network like this doesnt suprise me in the least. Apple's ecosystem has often been praised for its tight integration, and this consistent network connectivity is the result. Anybody who has worked with large scale services that rely on messaging services to ensure people get timely notifications and data, knows that you need services which are continuously polling endpoints to che…

> Polling domains when attached to the network Apple devices do communicate over BT even when you explicitly turn it off and put your device in flight mode.

Only if you use Apple Watch and or Contact Tracing features
Post reply on HN