Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
11–20 of 444 posts
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#12Is it possible to run multiple reasoning models on one problem? (Why not? I guess).
Another funny thought is: they release their Small model, and kept their Medium as a premium service. I wonder if you could do chains with Medium run occasionally, linked together by local runs of Small?
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#13Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#14Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#15Benchmarks suggest this model loses to Deepseek-R1 in every one-shot comparison. Considering they were likely not even pitting it against the newer R1 version (no mention of that in the article) and at more than double the cost, this looks like the best AI company in the EU is struggling to keep up with the state-of-the-art.
I don't know what they are thinking.
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#16Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#17Would be interesting to see a comparison with Qwen 32B. I found it a fantastic local model (ollama).
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#18Qwen3-4B almost beats Magistral-22B on the 4 available benchmarks, and Qwen3-30B-A3B is miles ahead.
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#19This makes it yet another example of European companies building great products but fumbling marketing.
Mistral's edge is speed. It's a real pleasure to use because it answers in ~1s what takes other models 5-8s, which makes for a much better experience. But instead of focusing on it, they bury it far down the post.
Try it and see if you like the speed! Note that the speed advantage only applies to queries that don't require web-search, as Mistral is significantly slower on this one, leading to a ~5 seconds advantage over 2 minutes of research for the queries I benchmarked with Grok.
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#20Benchmarks suggest this model loses to Deepseek-R1 in every one-shot comparison. Considering they were likely not even pitting it against the newer R1 version (no mention of that in the article) and at more than double the cost, this looks like the best AI company in the EU is struggling to keep up with the state-of-the-art.
"EU is leading in regulation", they say. I don't know what they are thinking.