Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Most users won't report bugs unless you make it stupidly easy

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 226 posts

Re: Show HN: Most users won't report bugs unless you make it stupidly easy

#21
post #4

The difficulty in reporting a bug comes from the friction required to filter the "page doesn't work" with no further explanation reports, or the "my neighbour is a spy for the government and I have proof" reports (real types of reports for a browser company, for example, which surely exist for other places users think that "is" the internet like Facebook). I agree that reporting bugs can be hard, but the amount of sp…

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Most users won't report bugs unless you make it stupidly easy

#22

You write that "reporting bugs is usually a terrible experience". I find bugs ALL THE TIME, and yet, when I even try to find a way to contact ANYONE, let alone a developer, they leave no door open at all. No method, no form, no contact name, no nothing. I (along with many, I presume), actually want those companies to excel. I WANT to let them know what to fix. But, they just don't want to hear about it. Really sad I…

I think if you take for example apps on the Atlassian Marketplace, probably all of them have an easy way to contact them (Probably because they get Jira for free, granted).

Re: Show HN: Most users won't report bugs unless you make it stupidly easy

#23
post #4

The difficulty in reporting a bug comes from the friction required to filter the "page doesn't work" with no further explanation reports, or the "my neighbour is a spy for the government and I have proof" reports (real types of reports for a browser company, for example, which surely exist for other places users think that "is" the internet like Facebook). I agree that reporting bugs can be hard, but the amount of sp…

On the LLM idea, if you could group reports by issue (by parsing the user provided input and whatever context you save from the page screenshot into some embedding) and then only escalate things when several different IPs have reported a similar thing within X amount of time, I think you could handle two birds with one stone. Limits how annoying spammers can be, and also makes the good reports easier to understand since a few bug reports combined should make a better whole.

I however wouldn't shorten/transform reports with an LLM, or make spammy reports inaccessible. Just doing the semantic grouping for escalation. It's true you're getting free work from your users, and the human factor is pretty important here, even if an LLM might sometimes misinterpret it.

Re: Show HN: Most users won't report bugs unless you make it stupidly easy

#24
post #4

The difficulty in reporting a bug comes from the friction required to filter the "page doesn't work" with no further explanation reports, or the "my neighbour is a spy for the government and I have proof" reports (real types of reports for a browser company, for example, which surely exist for other places users think that "is" the internet like Facebook). I agree that reporting bugs can be hard, but the amount of sp…

With all due respect, That is the price you pay for your users doing _free_ software testing for you! We are on the “listen to your users” mecca and you’re complaining that listening to your users is hard and you wish a machine could help you with it.

Re: Show HN: Most users won't report bugs unless you make it stupidly easy

#25
post #7

I won't report bugs in paid software/services because it's not my job, I'm not paid for it, I'm user of the service, not free workforce so they can reduce amount of QA staff or skip it completely. Give me a discount and then maybe , just maybe I'll think twice about reporting something. Bugs renders your soft unusable? Fine, there is plenty of competition out there who will do it right.

So you: A) only pay for perfection and B) experience zero friction or cost in moving services?

I think trying to argue with the sentiment, misses the point entirely. I think we can all agree, bug reporting could use a renaissance.

Re: Show HN: Most users won't report bugs unless you make it stupidly easy

#27
post #7

I won't report bugs in paid software/services because it's not my job, I'm not paid for it, I'm user of the service, not free workforce so they can reduce amount of QA staff or skip it completely. Give me a discount and then maybe , just maybe I'll think twice about reporting something. Bugs renders your soft unusable? Fine, there is plenty of competition out there who will do it right.

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Most users won't report bugs unless you make it stupidly easy

#29
post #4

The difficulty in reporting a bug comes from the friction required to filter the "page doesn't work" with no further explanation reports, or the "my neighbour is a spy for the government and I have proof" reports (real types of reports for a browser company, for example, which surely exist for other places users think that "is" the internet like Facebook). I agree that reporting bugs can be hard, but the amount of sp…

> The difficulty in reporting a bug comes from the friction required to filter the "page doesn't work" with no further explanation reports

This so much.

I can't tell you how often I've seen someone trying to get tech support on something say "When I load the program, I get an error" but don't even say what the error says. I understand that most people have never worked a QA job and so don't know how to write a good bug report, but certainly I would expect someone to copy/paste the error message.

Re: Show HN: Most users won't report bugs unless you make it stupidly easy

#30
Here's a quick bug report: I didn't know how I can check out the app you built. There were no links in your post. Only "Bugdrop.app", the name. I tried Googling it and it turns out Bugdrop.app is your actual domain. You should point that out: Bugdrop.app => https://bugdrop.app/

On macOS .app is the standard extension for any installed app.

Post reply on HN