The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
blog.computationalcomplexity.org
The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
1–10 of 54 posts
Re: The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
#2Re: The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
#3The general study of such things is called “randomness extractors”. The new Gödel prize goes to this paper which shows how to extract a nearly perfect random bit out of two sources with low min-entropy.
Re: The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
#4Re: The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
#5If I give you a biased coin can you simulate a truly random coin flip with it? The answer turns out to be yes. Flip the biased coin twice: HT = heads, TH = tails, and HH/TT = flip twice again. The general study of such things is called “randomness extractors”. The new Gödel prize goes to this paper which shows how to extract a nearly perfect random bit out of two sources with low min-entropy.
Re: The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
#6[flagged]
Re: The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
#7If I give you a biased coin can you simulate a truly random coin flip with it? The answer turns out to be yes. Flip the biased coin twice: HT = heads, TH = tails, and HH/TT = flip twice again. The general study of such things is called “randomness extractors”. The new Gödel prize goes to this paper which shows how to extract a nearly perfect random bit out of two sources with low min-entropy.
Re: The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
#8If I give you a biased coin can you simulate a truly random coin flip with it? The answer turns out to be yes. Flip the biased coin twice: HT = heads, TH = tails, and HH/TT = flip twice again. The general study of such things is called “randomness extractors”. The new Gödel prize goes to this paper which shows how to extract a nearly perfect random bit out of two sources with low min-entropy.
Yes, but - you need to replace "twice" there with "an unbounded number of times". If you apply this in an environment where the biased coin is coming from an external source, your system becomes susceptible to DoS attacks.
Re: The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but - you need to replace "twice" there with "an unbounded number of times". If you apply this in an environment where the biased coin is coming from an external source, your system becomes susceptible to DoS attacks.
While I obviously think randomness extractors over adversarial sources are very interesting, I think talking about them specifically in this example complicates the point I'm trying to make, which is that it's incredible it can be done at all.
I realize this sounds like a minor detail to someone who finds this cool (and so do I), but I don't think it is. It's kind of frustrating to be told that your intuition is wrong by someone smarter than you, when your intuition is actually correct and the experts are moving the goalposts. IMO, it makes people lose respect for experts/authority.