X's new "encrypted" XChat feature doesn't seem to be any more secure
1–10 of 86 posts
Re: X's new "encrypted" XChat feature doesn't seem to be any more secure
#2Re: X's new "encrypted" XChat feature doesn't seem to be any more secure
#3[0]: http://xchat.org
Re: X's new "encrypted" XChat feature doesn't seem to be any more secure
#4In a nutshell: we have unclear comments from Musk and unclear statements in the FAQ (which might not have been written by a technical person). Until they release a technical white paper, we don’t know anything for sure.
Re: X's new "encrypted" XChat feature doesn't seem to be any more secure
#5I assume this means that the "encryption" is about as strong as base64.
Re: X's new "encrypted" XChat feature doesn't seem to be any more secure
#6In a nutshell: we have unclear comments from Musk and unclear statements in the FAQ (which might not have been written by a technical person). Until they release a technical white paper, we don’t know anything for sure.
That doesn't mean that we know for sure that the team doesn't have cryptography experts, but ... I have my doubts. Surely we'd have heard details by now if that was the case.
(I mean "Bitcoin style"! The most important part of encrypted chat is confidentiality, and no part of Bitcoin's architecture even ATTEMPTS to ensure confidentiality! Everything's permanently stored in plaintext on the public ledger FFS!!!!)
Re: X's new "encrypted" XChat feature doesn't seem to be any more secure
#7As a user of XChat[0] since 1999, I can tell you that it's definitely not encrypted or secure. Don't believe the hype! [0]: http://xchat.org
It’s not the same XChat
Re: X's new "encrypted" XChat feature doesn't seem to be any more secure
#8> Currently, we do not offer protections against man-in-the-middle attacks. As a result, if someone—a malicious insider or X itself as a result of a compulsory legal process—were to compromise an encrypted conversation I assume this means that the "encryption" is about as strong as base64.