81–90 of 113 posts
I wanted to try Claude code but it's 200$ per month which is INR17000 per month. This was expensive even when I had a job. Now it feels like all this power is accessible only to the rich. When Geoffrey suggested [1] AI will increase wealth for rich he was not wrong. https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/ai-will-incr...
> The breakthrough moment came when I was migrating to a new Mac. Or just use Migration Assistant?
See the footnote. If you use this then iPhone Mirroring is broken on current macOS. And I need that for my next project.
> Automate Content: Like this very post. I use Wispr Flow to talk with Claude, explain the topic and tell it to read my past blog posts to write in my style. This post is generated. Meaning, it wasn't written with the same aim towards truth and relevance that we assume writers have. It looks like writing, and fools readers into thinking it's writing. But it's just text. What's the purpose in reading it as opposed to…
So your argument is that only text written by hand can convey useful information? If it was dictated or transcribed, it's somehow lesser and unworthy of attention?
No. I don't know where you got that from.
I am quite honestly baffled by all these posts. I'm not a hardcore skeptic, at least I don't think so, I have tried most of the vibe coding tools, and I regularly try new ones and continue using many; and I do NOT have the experience described in all these posts. So two possibilities come to mind: 1. I, somehow, use every single one of those tools wrong. 2. Or; you and the other people raving about Claude code are so…
Every time I see a post like yours, I see the reply saying "yeah you're using it wrong". I can't say either 1 or 2 is true, but if you saw the recent post[0] about cloudflare making an API entirely with Claude, it could be more of a case of not using the tools to their potential.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does seem weird for someone to expect others to spend their time fully reading something… when they also have access to the same tools and can just tell it to summarize it back.
That would be true for writing where the author typed a sentence and the LLM expanded it to multiple paragraphs. That is not what happened here: the author provided a lot more input than the finished article, and used the LLM to help crunch that down to as good a version as possible of the points there wanted to make.
I setup a new computer in ~15 minutes top. Everything is here: https://github.com/Frizlab/frizlabs-conf. Only thing I have to do first is install brew basically.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I worked about 4h on this and 50+ prompts. See the GitHub PR. In the end that’s not much different to iterating with a direct editor.
Then why not just write it? You mention not having to write Markdown in the post, but c’mon dude, you’re a software developer. Presumably the fact you have a personal blog means you must enjoy some aspect of writing, so what’s the end game here? I mean you do you I guess—it’s your blog and I’m nobody. But if I’m reading someone’s thoughts I want _their_ words, not something filtered through a machine.
lmao, I watched Claude write a bash file that: rm rf'd my HOME file. I'm good on all of this for a while.
I'm curious - what did you ask it to do?