Live data from Hacker News

If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued

betterthanrandom.substack.com

21–30 of 372 posts

Re: If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued

#21
According to this definition, being involved more, I'd rather be useful than valued. Like Socrates who went to the market to see what things he doesn't need, I cherish each meeting I am not invited to. It's a blessing.

As long as the pay is good (or better) than in the "valued" path, useful is better.

Exception: I have equity and the decisions made are bad.

Re: If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued

#22
I like and appreciate the authors points but just wish they would have done more with the connection of the two.

You might be valued because you are many things. You might not be valued because of many things. If you are able to be useful and valued, while also being fulfilled and happy personally and professionally -- that's great.

But, there is normally not a direct and clear situation like this in organizations. If there is, enjoy it while you have it. Normally, it's not as direct and clear to assess and understand. You are also part of this equation. The dynamics in an organization are normally not consistent.

Dynamics in organizations can shift quickly. Culture can also mean you could be doing all you can but the situation is no longer good for you for a variety of reasons or good for the organization.

Informed re-evaluation of your own value in your situation, at reasonable points, is vital. You may be not as great as you think you are, you might not be able to feel valued or useful in a changed or toxic environment. You may not care about that stuff. The organization may be incapable of providing any of that validation but, ultimately, it's up to you to decide what you are able to live with and why. How the organization provides whatever for you to contemplate is part of the calculation that must rest on your shoulders -- and that effort is ongoing and important.

Re: If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued

#23

According to this definition, being involved more, I'd rather be useful than valued. Like Socrates who went to the market to see what things he doesn't need, I cherish each meeting I am not invited to. It's a blessing. As long as the pay is good (or better) than in the "valued" path, useful is better. Exception: I have equity and the decisions made are bad.

With all the layoffs happening in my company, I’ll take at least a bit of being valued right now

Re: If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued

#24
post #2

water is useful. Diamond is valued. So be the diamond, not the water. Unless there's no water around anymore...

you are saying diamond is not useful ?

Diamonds that are actually useful are quite cheap, compared to the useless ones.

Re: If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued

#25
post #18
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think so. A lot of managers value people who excel at talking big while doing little (if any) useful work, while they ignore the useful people who actually get things done.

Playing office politics right is the most important thing at work. Doing real work is secondary. On other hand as a workhorse I punch occasionally every management’s darling in the face. They don‘t like me, but they know, that somebody must do technical heavy lifting. Of course, I am number one in the layoff’s list :-)

Can you work well in a team ?

Being a work horse is nice. But if you can’t work with others, that might be one you are on the layoff list

Re: If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued

#26
post #19

> I had become the go-to person for making things run smoothly, for fixing urgent problems, for delivering. But every time I pushed toward more strategic and ambitious directions, there was a lot of can-kicking and “let’s think about it” that went nowhere. I was incredibly useful to the organization, but not necessarily valued, and at some point, I started feeling a sense of stagnation. Compensation was good, the act…

I was reading that and thinking "some people are never happy". I mean, they got a nice job, nice compensation, recognition... the only thing missing, apparently, was that they were not part of the company's "strategy team"? In my experience, you can be the smartest person in the world, if the company already has a small strategy team (or top management) that is pulling all the strings and they're happy with that setup, you'll basically never be able to become a part of that, barring major changes in the company's org chart.

Re: If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued

#28
Valued = useful + hard to find.

The more rare you are, the more you are valued. You still have to be useful to be valuable though.

In order to acquire those rare skills, an ungodly amount of work is often required. It is also a huge variable. A rare skill today can become useless tomorrow.

Also, beware of indispensable people. "This company needs me" can have all sorts of causes. Maybe you didn't documented things right, maybe you just have a long history with them. It doesn't mean being rare. Being rare is feeling "this skill I have could be of use to any similar company and few people know it".

The skill could be anything. Perfect pitch, excelent document writing, de-escalation, low-level bit shaving.

Re: If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued

#30
Feeling valued is the key here. If you need external validation then by all means, work smarter towards it. Become a manager. Become a company influencer. Build a brand, and sell it hard.

At some point later in life, I hope you’ll figure out your own sense of value, true to your being, and decoupled from what others may grant. Your raison d'être.

Post reply on HN