AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
revontulet.dev
AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
1–10 of 52 posts
Re: AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
#2No, we are not. Pretrained models do not learn from their prompts. Their state is volatile.
Re: AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
#3No, we are not. Pretrained models do not learn from their prompts. Their state is volatile.
Read the article: it is criticizing the claim.
Re: AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
#4Did you drop that ";-)" from the title because you want to showcase how few people actually read articles posted on HN and just respond to titles. Or did you not read further yourself and didn't even notice it? :P
Re: AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
#5Re: AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
#6Did you drop that ";-)" from the title because you want to showcase how few people actually read articles posted on HN and just respond to titles. Or did you not read further yourself and didn't even notice it? :P
Yeah I dropped it thinking HN might not allow it :)
Re: AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
#7Wonder how many people are only going to read the headline, because it isnt claiming that AGI is coming in 6 months at all.
Re: AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
#8Did you drop that ";-)" from the title because you want to showcase how few people actually read articles posted on HN and just respond to titles. Or did you not read further yourself and didn't even notice it? :P
Probably got automatically trimmed off by HN's title-fixer thing.
Re: AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
#9Wonder how many people are only going to read the headline, because it isnt claiming that AGI is coming in 6 months at all.
[deleted]
Re: AI-first – We're just 6 months away from AGI
#10Wonder how many people are only going to read the headline, because it isnt claiming that AGI is coming in 6 months at all.
I just thought "AGI will be coming in 6 months every month from now on, until the peddlers run out of suckers^H^H^H investors. And of course I skipped the article.