Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean by "purely with logic, no guessing"? "Guess and backtrack" is a totally valid form of deduction for pen-and-paper puzzles, it's just not very satisfying. But often (always?) there is a satisfying deduction technique that could have replaced the guess-and-check, it may just be fairly obtuse. Or do you just mean where the clues for the raster don't result in a unique solution?
Not OP, but you don't ever have to guess and backtrack, you can always work out the next move. After playing about 100 boards several simple "rules" emerge which allow for this.
* 5, 0, 1 1 1, 2 2, 3 1 and 3 1 are immediately solved
* 4 lets you set 3 squares immediately
* 3, 2 1 and 1 2 let you set 1 square immediately