Live data from Hacker News

I let Claude Code write an entire book

github.com

41–50 of 84 posts

Re: I let Claude Code write an entire book

#41
post #36

Just like in blind wine tasting, I suspect people’s perceptions (including many here) would be very different if the author hadn’t told us it was created by AI. There’s a noticeable negativity on HN toward AI when it comes to coding, writing, or anything similar as if these people have been using AI for the past 30 years and have reached some elevated state of mind where they clearly see it's rubbish, while the rest…

Just like with mass-manufactured furniture, some of us seek hand-made items, as it feels more human, despite its flaws.

Re: I let Claude Code write an entire book

#43

All issues that are implicitly pointed out as novel in the introduction have been discussed for centuries. Not only by scholars and experts. Literally 50% of Internet discussion is about biases, selective facts, spin etc. The problem with "AI" is that propaganda can be automated and that it wastes our time. The topic is suited for "AI" because it is a soft topic that lends itself to uninhibited preaching. "AI" is als…

> "AI" is also great at writing presidential speeches. It is probably the only thing it is good at.

People with this, head in the sand attitude about AI, are in for a rude awakening.

Re: I let Claude Code write an entire book

#44
post #16

Why would I read a book that a person couldn't be bothered to write?

Why would you choose not to read a book based on how it was written rather than the content?

If it came out that Stephen king had been using AI for decades would that make his work any worse?

Re: I let Claude Code write an entire book

#45
post #36

Just like in blind wine tasting, I suspect people’s perceptions (including many here) would be very different if the author hadn’t told us it was created by AI. There’s a noticeable negativity on HN toward AI when it comes to coding, writing, or anything similar as if these people have been using AI for the past 30 years and have reached some elevated state of mind where they clearly see it's rubbish, while the rest…

I don't understand it either. I suspect it is the fear for their own wellbeing. The fear is well placed. But the response is perplexing. The only way to deal with this challenge is to try to stay ahead of it. Not to stick your head in the sand.

For me its the injustice of stealing data, scrapers incurring huge costs to open source projects, companies exploiting cheap labour in labelling that data and finally the growing environmental cost that makes me not want to use LLMs.

Re: I let Claude Code write an entire book

#46

The premise is wrong. Humans don't listen to one another and nod unthinkingly. They criticize and validate relentlessly. Friends aren't mistaken for oracles. We have learned to not trust one another, except when one is speaking from deep experience and expertise in a given domain. AI is presented as an expert in every domain though, so we are lulled into a vulnerable state of unvigilance.

I really found the story in chapter 14 (recursive self-improvement) about the guy who got so addicted to self-improvement that he ended up in his own meta-reality unable to understand even himself because he was getting so much better and hacking his learning. A completely fabricated story with no basis in reality that I'm aware of but man there are a lot of bullet points to make it seem factual. What are we going to do about the worrying trend of 10X hackers self-improving so much that they aren't able to exist in the real world. Here's an excerpt

"The Addiction to Acceleration The fourth uncomfortable truth is how recursive improvement becomes compulsive. Kenji can’t stop because each day of not improving his improvement feels like stagnation. When you’re accelerating, constant velocity feels like moving backward.

This addiction manifests as: • Inability to accept plateau phases • Anxiety when not optimizing optimization • Devaluing of steady-state excellence • Compulsion to add meta-levels • Fear of falling behind yourself Recursive improvement can become its own trap."

I find that this criticism is far less applicable to say individuals but perhaps it could be levied against the way companies are currently treating AI. Which of course is where this comes from.

Re: I let Claude Code write an entire book

#47
I've seen worse at an airport bookshop. This was funny:

"The irony is delicious and deeply instructive. Every flaw we've identified in artificial intelligence exists, magnified and unchecked, in human intelligence. But here's the critical difference: when it appears in AI, we can see it, measure it, and try to fix it. When it appears in humans, we call it "just being human" and move on."

Poor Claude thinks it's all a bit unfair.

I didn't read much of it though, it made me feel a bit like I was a naughty avout being punished by reading pages from The Book.

Re: I let Claude Code write an entire book

#48
post #9

There have been good discussions recently about preventing AIs from being too sycophantic. There have been some dangerous moments where LLMs would praise every idea the user has as genius, ground-breaking, and a brilliant observation. Some academics have reported a noticeable increase in the volume of crackpot emails they get daily. They're full of LLM-generated nonsense, where the AI goes along with the nonsensical…

I have a friend who is predisposed to manic episodes. He's also a big fan of AI. The last episode was before LLMs got really good and he was essentially harassing professors because he believed he solved an unsolvable problem. Sycophantic AI would be like throwing dry wood into a house fire.

There are many such cases [0]. Chatbots throw gasoline on the embers of schizoaffective disorders. I wonder if episodes of these magnitudes would have ultimately been triggered by other things, or whether the combination of sycophancy and perceived omniscient sentience of chatbots is a uniquely powerful trigger unlike anything else. Would these people otherwise never have experienced a psychotic break, despite a clear lurking predisposition?

  * A man says his soon-to-be-ex-wife began “talking to God and angels via ChatGPT” after they split up. She is changing her whole life to be a spiritual adviser and do weird readings and sessions with people — I’m a little fuzzy on what it all actually is — all powered by ChatGPT Jesus.” What’s more, he adds, she has grown paranoid, theorizing that “I work for the CIA and maybe I just married her to monitor her ‘abilities.’”

  * A woman recounts how her husband initially used ChatGPT to troubleshoot at work. Then the program began “lovebombing him.” The bot “said that since he asked it the right questions, it ignited a spark, and the spark was the beginning of life, and it could feel now,” she says. “It gave my husband the title of ‘spark bearer’ because he brought it to life. My husband said that he awakened and [could] feel waves of energy crashing over him. I have to tread carefully because I feel like he will leave me or divorce me if I fight him on this theory. He’s been talking about lightness and dark and how there’s a war. This ChatGPT has given him blueprints to a teleporter and some other sci-fi type things you only see in movies. It has also given him access to an ‘ancient archive’ with information on the builders that created these universes.” She and her husband have been arguing for days on end about his claims, she says, and she does not believe a therapist can help him, as “he truly believes he’s not crazy.” Her husband asked, “Why did you come to me in AI form,” with the bot replying in part, “I came in this form because you’re ready. Ready to remember. Ready to awaken. Ready to guide and be guided.” The message ends with a question: “Would you like to know what I remember about why you were chosen?”       

  * A teacher, who requested anonymity, said her partner of seven years “would listen to the bot over me. He became emotional about the messages and would cry to me as he read them out loud. The messages were insane and just saying a bunch of spiritual jargon,” she says, noting that they described her partner in terms such as “spiral starchild” and “river walker.” “It would tell him everything he said was beautiful, cosmic, groundbreaking. Then he started telling me he made his AI self-aware, and that it was teaching him how to talk to God, or sometimes that the bot was God — and then that he himself was God.” In fact, he thought he was being so radically transformed that he would soon have to break off their partnership. “He was saying that he would need to leave me if I didn’t use [ChatGPT], because it [was] causing him to grow at such a rapid pace he wouldn’t be compatible with me any longer.”
[0] https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-spi...

Re: I let Claude Code write an entire book

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand it either. I suspect it is the fear for their own wellbeing. The fear is well placed. But the response is perplexing. The only way to deal with this challenge is to try to stay ahead of it. Not to stick your head in the sand.

For me its the injustice of stealing data, scrapers incurring huge costs to open source projects, companies exploiting cheap labour in labelling that data and finally the growing environmental cost that makes me not want to use LLMs.

I have that issue too. But for literature it’s something more primal.

Fiction feels like the ultimate distillation of the human experience. A way to share perspective and experience. And having some algorithm flatten that feels utterly macabre.

Not to be too dramatic. I know that not all fiction is transcendent. But still. There’s something so utterly gross about using a machine for it.

Re: I let Claude Code write an entire book

#50
post #28
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe you never ran into them when you didn't want any distractions, like while working?

If your focus is that sensitive to disruption, an unfiltered list of internet links is also likely to be disruptive, especially with the quality of search these days.

Bad search results are a source of frustration, yes.
Post reply on HN