FLUX.1 Kontext

#1

Post by minimaxir » Thu, May 29, 2025, 5:40 PM UTC

Re: FLUX.1 Kontext

#2

Post by SV_BubbleTime » Thu, May 29, 2025, 6:30 PM UTC

Single shot LORA effect if it works as they cherry pick will be a game changer for editing.

As with almost any AI release though, unless it’s open weights, I don’t care. The strengths and weaknesses of these models are apparent when you run them locally.

Re: FLUX.1 Kontext

#3

Post by nullbyte » Thu, May 29, 2025, 6:36 PM UTC

Hopefully they list this on HuggingFace for the opensource community. It looks like a great model!

Re: FLUX.1 Kontext

#4

Post by fortran77 » Thu, May 29, 2025, 6:37 PM UTC

It still has no idea what a Model F keyboard looks like. I tried prompts and editing, and got things that weren't even close.

Re: FLUX.1 Kontext

#5

Post by anjneymidha » Thu, May 29, 2025, 6:39 PM UTC

Technical report here for those curious: https://cdn.sanity.io/files/gsvmb6gz/production/880b07220899...

Re: FLUX.1 Kontext

#6

Post by yorwba » Thu, May 29, 2025, 6:42 PM UTC

fortran77 wrote: post #4

It still has no idea what a Model F keyboard looks like. I tried prompts and editing, and got things that weren't even close.

You mean when you edit a picture of a Model F keyboard and tell it to use it in a scene, it still produces a different keyboard?

Re: FLUX.1 Kontext

#7

Post by rvz » Thu, May 29, 2025, 6:43 PM UTC

anjneymidha wrote: post #5

Technical report here for those curious: https://cdn.sanity.io/files/gsvmb6gz/production/880b07220899...

Unfortunately, nobody wants to read the report, but what they are really after is to download the open-weight model.

So they can take it and run with it. (No contributing back either).

Re: FLUX.1 Kontext

#8

Post by anjneymidha » Thu, May 29, 2025, 6:48 PM UTC

rvz wrote: post #7

anjneymidha wrote: post #5

Technical report here for those curious: https://cdn.sanity.io/files/gsvmb6gz/production/880b07220899...

Unfortunately, nobody wants to read the report, but what they are really after is to download the open-weight model. So they can take it and run with it. (No contributing back either).

"FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

Open-weights, distilled variant of Kontext, our most advanced generative image editing model. Coming soon" is what they say on https://bfl.ai/models/flux-kontext

Re: FLUX.1 Kontext

#9

Post by sigmoid10 » Thu, May 29, 2025, 6:53 PM UTC

anjneymidha wrote: post #8

rvz wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately, nobody wants to read the report, but what they are really after is to download the open-weight model. So they can take it and run with it. (No contributing back either).

"FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Open-weights, distilled variant of Kontext, our most advanced generative image editing model. Coming soon" is what they say on https://bfl.ai/models/flux-kontext

Distilled is a real downer, but I guess those AI startup CEOs still gotta eat.

Re: FLUX.1 Kontext

#10

Post by refulgentis » Thu, May 29, 2025, 6:57 PM UTC

rvz wrote: post #7

anjneymidha wrote: post #5

Technical report here for those curious: https://cdn.sanity.io/files/gsvmb6gz/production/880b07220899...

Unfortunately, nobody wants to read the report, but what they are really after is to download the open-weight model. So they can take it and run with it. (No contributing back either).

I agree that gooning crew drives a lot of open model downloads.

On HN, generally, people are more into technical discussion and/or productizing this stuff. Here, it seems declasse to mention the gooner angle, it's usually euphemized as intense reactions about refusing to download it involving the words "censor"