111–120 of 154 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can LLMs help?
Can they? I think it's weird that you ask a question (or, offer a possible solution in the shape of a question) without verifying your own assertion first. To answer your question, LLMs confirm you can't generate a random number in CSS.
Wayback machine for when it used to work: https://web.archive.org/web/20250317122419/https://benjamina...
Best anti-firebase post I've ever seen
Very impressive! As I've hit my mid-life slide and (regressed|progressed) back to my youth-self, I've found myself just writing a bunch of apps and sites in html and css and really enjoying it. One thing I still would like to see cracked is a random-like number in pure CSS. You can almost us there with some of the math functions and browser attributes, but I haven't found anything reliable.
Is this a thing? https://medium.com/hypersphere-codes/randomness-in-css-b55a0...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's sometimes done to make the same markup compatible with XHTML, without harming its interpretation in HTML.
You are either running XHTML or you are not. No need to carry any compatibility overhead. I doubt he is serving XHTML.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are either running XHTML or you are not. No need to carry any compatibility overhead. I doubt he is serving XHTML.
I personally prefer if only to stop other developers to not try doing content .
one
two
Best anti-firebase post I've ever seen
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are either running XHTML or you are not. No need to carry any compatibility overhead. I doubt he is serving XHTML.
I personally prefer if only to stop other developers to not try doing content .
There are other terms but I won't list them here.