Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

An upgraded dev experience in Google AI Studio

developers.googleblog.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 126 posts

Re: An upgraded dev experience in Google AI Studio

#31

Post by chermi »

koakuma-chan wrote: post #9

Why did they hide the model thought details? Thoughts look like this now: Analyzing TypeScript Errors I'm currently focused on the actions/user.ts file, where I've identified a few issues. Specifically, I need to address a "Cannot find name" error related to UpdateUserDetailsFormState, and confirm that the intended target is UpdateUserDetailsFormInput. There might be some other discrepancies in the file that I need t…

My understanding is that the ability to watch the chain of thought is no walled behind the ultra subscription?

Re: An upgraded dev experience in Google AI Studio

#32

Post by newlisp »

aaronharnly wrote: post #14

Presumably Google AI Studio[1] and Google Firebase Studio[2] are made by different teams with very similar pitches, and Google is perfectly happy to have both of them exist, until it isn't: - AI Studio: "the fastest place to start building with the Gemini API" - Firebase Studio: "Prototype, build, deploy, and run full-stack, AI apps quickly" [1] https://aistudio.google.com/apps [2] https://firebase.google.com/

next:

Canvas: "the fastest place to start building with the Gemini APP"

Also, did you hear about Jules?

Re: An upgraded dev experience in Google AI Studio

#33

Post by raihansaputra »

gexla wrote: post #27

Seeing these announcements make me nervous. I feel like I found some sort of cheat code by using AI Studio for free. Seeing them build it out, makes me wonder when they are going to start charging for it. Though Grok has been very generous as an alternate. I guess there's a lot of good options out there. I'm just used to hitting limits most places, and not as good models.

Agree. And for some reason I find responses from AI Studio is much better than Gemini for the same models. I _already have_ Gemini advanced, bit still mostly use AI studio just for the quality of the responses.

Re: An upgraded dev experience in Google AI Studio

#36

Post by com2kid »

nwienert wrote: post #24
neom wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.rabbit.tech/ They're developing some super interesting ways of the os developing itself as you use the device, apps building themselves, stuff like that. Super early days, but I have a really really good feeling about them (I know, everyone else doesn't and I'm sure thinks I'm nuts saying this).

You're not explaining why you have such a good feeling - is their team uniquely good, far ahead? Is there something specific in how they architected it? I think a lot of people are headed in this direction, they have a bad brand, the need to totally restructure their team, and probably bad equity structure now and a need for a down round, it'll be hard to get good talent.

The rabbit OS project is literally the only correct path forward for AI. Hopefully they go for local on device inference, as they removes cloud costs, solving the burning pile of cash problem most AI companies have.

Directly driving a user's device (or a device hooked up to a user's account at least) means an AI can do any task that a user can do, tearing down walled gardens. No more "my car doesn't allow programmatic access so I can't heat it up in the morning without opening the app."

Suddenly telling an agent "if it is below 50 outside preheat my car so it is warm when I leave at 8am" becomes a simple to solve problem.

Re: An upgraded dev experience in Google AI Studio

#37

Post by odo1242 »

neom wrote: post #23
aquova wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

... that little AI assistant gadget thing that bombed? Them?

Yes, I think people wrote them off WAY too quickly, I don't really want to get into a back and forth on if they should have done tech reviews even at all blah blah blah, yeah I agree wasn't an ideal way to introduce yourself to the world, but if you listen to their CEO, use their product, and pay attention to the team they've put together... I feel strongly they're onto something big.

Keep in mind that the company the CEO last founded before working on Rabbit was a crypto scam, though. They’re really not giving people much reason to trust them.

Plus, why a separate device and not a mobile app?

Re: An upgraded dev experience in Google AI Studio

#38

Post by Keyframe »

suddenlybananas wrote: post #18
xnx wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree. Until about 2005 it was code-on-device and run-on-device. The tools and languages were limited in absolute capabilities, but easy to understand and use. For about the past 20 years we've been in a total mess of code-on-device -> (nightmare of deployment complexity) -> run-on-cloud. We are finally entering the code-on-cloud and run-on-cloud stage. I'm hoping this will allow domain experts to more easily creat…

>We are finally entering the code-on-cloud and run-on-cloud stage. Sounds like an absolute nightmare for freedom and autonomy.

but only because it is

Re: An upgraded dev experience in Google AI Studio

#40

Post by koakuma-chan »

hu3 wrote: post #30
aaronharnly wrote: post #14

Presumably Google AI Studio[1] and Google Firebase Studio[2] are made by different teams with very similar pitches, and Google is perfectly happy to have both of them exist, until it isn't: - AI Studio: "the fastest place to start building with the Gemini API" - Firebase Studio: "Prototype, build, deploy, and run full-stack, AI apps quickly" [1] https://aistudio.google.com/apps [2] https://firebase.google.com/

Bosses reading this: "this is brilliant! I'll assign multiple teams to the same project. Let the best team win! And then the other teams get PIP'd"

That's what Telegram does. They have multiple separate teams working on their own version of the same kind of project, and whoever does best wins.
Post reply on HN