I've heard so much praise for The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , but why, I'll never know. I bought it after hearing someone rave about it, and I'll be damned if I didn't hate every page of the book. It felt like a rebuff to The Design of Everyday Things . The former is currently sitting in my car, and I'll be trying to offload it to someone who actually wants it.
My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
21–30 of 56 posts
Re: My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
#22I've heard so much praise for The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , but why, I'll never know. I bought it after hearing someone rave about it, and I'll be damned if I didn't hate every page of the book. It felt like a rebuff to The Design of Everyday Things . The former is currently sitting in my car, and I'll be trying to offload it to someone who actually wants it.
Re: My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
#23I've heard so much praise for The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , but why, I'll never know. I bought it after hearing someone rave about it, and I'll be damned if I didn't hate every page of the book. It felt like a rebuff to The Design of Everyday Things . The former is currently sitting in my car, and I'll be trying to offload it to someone who actually wants it.
I'm curious. Why do you feel like Tufte's book is a "rebuff" of Norman's book? I've read both and find them complementary in many senses. The one criticism that I have found by Norman of Tufte's work is that Tufte preferred high "data density" but Norman argues that this is not always appropriate.
OTOH, I recall Tufte going on and on about cutting the "data-ink ratio" to the point of making graphs that we generally understand at a glance suddenly very unintuitive. I can dig into the book again if necessary, but I recall he essentially argued that box-and-whisker plots became just a few dots. There's meaning conveyed by the boxes and the whiskers, and changing that convention - even if it uses more ink than absolutely necessary - adds significant cognitive load.
Re: My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
#24Re: My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
#25Re: My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
#26I might pay the karma tax on this one but I've come to really appreciate "Times New Roman" (or TeX Gyre Termes + STIXTwoMath). Like the OP, I used to care a lot about fonts. Heck, at some point my Windows boot time got slowed down because of the sheer number of fonts it had to load! I used to think the default Latex font gives off a "serious" and "scientific" vibe. And I thought to myself: why would anyone ever use T…
Re: My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
#27I would recommend most fonts that Michael Sharpe worked on. He did some nice refinements on already-decent fonts, often to bring copies closer to the original[1]. Heck, I’d recommend them outside of LaTeX, too. Favorites out of those are XCharter, ScholaX, Etbb and Erewhon. Also have a look at Algol Revived, which is a remake of a font made for French Algol 60 books by famed type designer, Adrian Frutiger. [1]: https…
The blog post does this some justice though, the author does live in the current century, and does have nice examples.
/me is former LaTeX user from uni, not overly fond of it, for usability issues not unrelated to its legacy.
Re: My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
#28I might pay the karma tax on this one but I've come to really appreciate "Times New Roman" (or TeX Gyre Termes + STIXTwoMath). Like the OP, I used to care a lot about fonts. Heck, at some point my Windows boot time got slowed down because of the sheer number of fonts it had to load! I used to think the default Latex font gives off a "serious" and "scientific" vibe. And I thought to myself: why would anyone ever use T…
Re: My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
#29Re: My favourite fonts to use with LaTeX (2022)
#30Genuine question : why are all those fonts serif ones? I personnaly find them much harder to read than sans serif ones (including when printed on paper, not just on screens).