Claude Code SDK
docs.anthropic.com
Claude Code SDK
1–10 of 201 posts
Re: Claude Code SDK
#2Re: Claude Code SDK
#3you can skim the transcript but some personal highlights:
- anthropic employees, with unlimited claude, average to $6/day of usage
- headless claude code as a "linux" utility that you use everywhere in CI is pretty compelling
- claude code as a user extensible platform
- future roadmap of claude code: sandboxing, branching, planning
- sonnet 3.7 as a persistent, agentic model
Re: Claude Code SDK
#4Claude has been left in the dust by Gemini with its million token session and ability to upload a zip file of my entire code base.
Re: Claude Code SDK
#5Claude has been left in the dust by Gemini with its million token session and ability to upload a zip file of my entire code base.
and then get the honor of copy and pasting all of the changes afterward?
Works for a reasonable chunk of files say 5 to 10 that aren’t too big.
No doubt they’ll get to better file access.
Anyhow I’m quite happy to do the copy and paste because Geminis coding and debugging capability is far better than Claude.
Re: Claude Code SDK
#6Claude has been left in the dust by Gemini with its million token session and ability to upload a zip file of my entire code base.
If you (or anyone else reading this) wants to try out the upcoming beta give me a ping. (see profile.)
Re: Claude Code SDK
#7more context from the claude code team: http://latent.space/p/claude-code you can skim the transcript but some personal highlights: - anthropic employees, with unlimited claude, average to $6/day of usage - headless claude code as a "linux" utility that you use everywhere in CI is pretty compelling - claude code as a user extensible platform - future roadmap of claude code: sandboxing, branching, planning - sonnet 3.…
Re: Claude Code SDK
#8The "golden" end state of coding agents is that you give it a Feature Request (EG Jira ticket), and it gives you a PR to review and give feedback on. Cursor, windsurf, etc, are dead ends in that sense as they are local editors, and can not be in CI.
If you are tooling your codebase for optimal AI usage (Rules, MCP, etc), you should target a technology that can bridge the gap to headless usage. The fact Claude Code can trivially be used as part of automation through the tools means it's now the default way I thinking about coding agents (Codex, the npm package, is the same).
Disclaimer, I focus on helping companies tool their codebases for optimal agent usage, so I might have a bias here to easily configurable tools.
Re: Claude Code SDK
#9more context from the claude code team: http://latent.space/p/claude-code you can skim the transcript but some personal highlights: - anthropic employees, with unlimited claude, average to $6/day of usage - headless claude code as a "linux" utility that you use everywhere in CI is pretty compelling - claude code as a user extensible platform - future roadmap of claude code: sandboxing, branching, planning - sonnet 3.…
Maybe I'm holding it wrong, but I can easily spend $20+ using Claude Code for 2 hours. I've stopped using it because it was too expensive for my personal projects.
Re: Claude Code SDK
#10more context from the claude code team: http://latent.space/p/claude-code you can skim the transcript but some personal highlights: - anthropic employees, with unlimited claude, average to $6/day of usage - headless claude code as a "linux" utility that you use everywhere in CI is pretty compelling - claude code as a user extensible platform - future roadmap of claude code: sandboxing, branching, planning - sonnet 3.…
Maybe I'm holding it wrong, but I can easily spend $20+ using Claude Code for 2 hours. I've stopped using it because it was too expensive for my personal projects.