Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple are suing Motorola(Google), so this lawsuit is just another part of the response directed back at Apple. It's not like Motorola just decided to go after another cellphone manufacturer for patent violations, as an offensive move.
They did actually. 2010, Oct 06: Motorola sues Apple over 18 patents, and files an ITC complaint against Apple over 6 of them. 2010, Oct 29: Apple sues Motorola over 6 patents, and files an ITC complaint against Motorola over 3 of them.
Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
111–120 of 218 posts
Re: Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Actually, prior documents released from Motorola and Apple show that Motorola wanted 2.25% of Apple's revenue for its patents[1] - on a $500 device, that's $1.50. Apple rejected those terms. Compare that to Apple's demand of $40/device from Samsung - it's not favorable. [1] http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/04/what-motorola-wants-2...
2.25% of $500 is $11.25
Re: Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Don't be evil" doesn't mean sit back and get sued to oblivion by your competitors like a selfless martyr.
Don't be evil means use your patents as a defense not to sue others. It means amass a big enough trove that others feel that suing you is going to be futile. Evil is attacking the opponent with the new patents you just "bought" not even developed in-house
Re: Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple has sold over a hundred million iPhones and has sewn up a large chunk of the most profitable market segment. That should be enough of a reward.
Apple defined the landscape that all Android phones now inhabit. Your view doesn't make sense to me. If you buy a nice car by working hard, should I be allowed to take it from you after you have had 'enough' time to drive it?
Re: Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
#115I stopped buying Apple products because of this patent nonsense, so I guess that means I can't buy that Nexus 7 I was eyeing either. Why is it that giant companies consistently act so evil?
Why is Apple evil for defending itself from companies who are copying much of the look and feel of their phones? If you invented a new approach to smartphones that became really successful and changed the industry, wouldn't you want to protect your hard work from others who copied it?
Re: Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
#116Re: Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
#117Does anybody else feel all the tech giants standing around with their patents in hand is like all the characters standing around with guns like at the end of Reservoir Dogs? "Nobody innovate or we'll shoot!" It's intriguing at first, but you can only keep it up so long before the plot line gets annoying because no one is doing anything (or innovating), or someone gets shot.
let's be clear. this war is apple's doing, not "all the tech giants".
Re: Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
#118I think Google is smarter than what looks at the surface. They are indirectly targeting timing of iPhone 5 and Apple's revenue. Good timing Google.
"Even if Motorola won an import ban next week, it would not affect the iPhone 4S and the new iPad 4G, nor the widely-anticipated iPhone 5, which is also expected to incorporate a Qualcomm baseband chipset."
http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/08/google-opts-for-escalatio...
Re: Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
#119Re: Google Sues Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S.
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple defined the landscape that all Android phones now inhabit. Your view doesn't make sense to me. If you buy a nice car by working hard, should I be allowed to take it from you after you have had 'enough' time to drive it?
Apple built a product that was innovative but clearly derivative of what Motorola had been selling for decades, why shouldn't Motorola defend itself in the market it created?