[flagged]
Delete your comment. You're minimising the death of children. Yeah I'm sensitive about this. I like many other parents of children who have been lost to genetic disease have good reason to be.
Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
131–140 of 570 posts
Re: Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately a staggering amount of research in other countries is largely funded by the NIH/USA.
And so what?
Unless those other countries step up and fund it themselves.
They might. They might not.
Re: Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
The anti-eugenics guy just said he would "absolutely" murder a baby...?
Re: Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[flagged]
There could be other babies that can also grow up to be future Hitlers. So let's say 4 such babies exist. By killing one I eliminated 1/4 for futures with Grown up Hitlers that exist.
This whole thread is getting flagged. Likely by an irrational parent who can't even compute natural selection, babe, and Hitler all in a single paragraph.
Re: Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
#135> To accomplish that feat, the treatment is wrapped in fatty lipid molecules to protect it from degradation in the blood on its way to the liver, where the edit will be made. Inside the lipids are instructions that command the cells to produce an enzyme that edits the gene. They also carry a molecular GPS — CRISPR — which was altered to crawl along a person’s DNA until it finds the exact DNA letter that needs to be c…
> That is one of the most incredible things I have ever read. This is even more great reading behind the above: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Doudna
Re: Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
#136NYT isn’t super specific here, but they made it sound like the disease treated is liver related. My understanding is that the liver is a good place to start with CRISPR-type gene treatments, in that the liver normally deals with anomalous shit in your bloodstream, say, like CRISPR type edits. So anywhere outside the liver is going to be significantly harder to get really broad uptake of gene edits. It’s crazy encoura…
As to the FDA stance, it tends to be more willing to go ahead with compassionate uses like this when it's clearly life or death.[1]
[1] https://www.statnews.com/2025/05/15/crispr-gene-editing-land... This discuss a little of the FDA stuff but not much more detail, it sounds like they did let them skip some testing.
Re: Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
#137Re: Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
#138Re: Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
Made it sound like it's a computer, is it Turing complete?
Made me think of It was only in college, when I read Douglas Hofstadter’s Gödel, Escher, Bach, that I came to understand cells as recursively self-modifying programs. The language alone was evocative. It suggested that the embryo—DNA making RNA, RNA making protein, protein regulating the transcription of DNA into RNA—was like a small Lisp program, with macros begetting macros begetting macros, the source code contain…
I misread this as "fleshy" for a moment, and the quote almost works better that way.
Re: Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment
#140[flagged]