Earlier quoted context omitted.
I spent most of my time playing with other kids around my block in the park, and just hanging out in the arcades, shooting pool, bowling, playing video games together, watching movies, or just wandering around the streets. When I needed to contact someone, I'd actually walk to his/her house and ring their bell
...the context of the question was the inside of a restaurant.
Restaurant offers a 5% discount if you eat without your phone on the table
101–105 of 105 posts
Re: Restaurant offers a 5% discount if you eat without your phone on the table
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
I spent most of my time playing with other kids around my block in the park, and just hanging out in the arcades, shooting pool, bowling, playing video games together, watching movies, or just wandering around the streets. When I needed to contact someone, I'd actually walk to his/her house and ring their bell
...the context of the question was the inside of a restaurant.
Re: Restaurant offers a 5% discount if you eat without your phone on the table
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same with me: I hate having stuff in my pockets when I sit, specially with jeans. But now that I'm aware that it might send the wrong message, I'll try to keep just my phone in my pocket (the first Galaxy S, it's not very big) if I have lunch with some I do not know very well. Edit: As others have commented, I do always leave it face down on top of my wallet which hopefully always comes across as "I'm just leaving my…
Putting the wallet on top of the phone is probably even better!
Re: Restaurant offers a 5% discount if you eat without your phone on the table
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
I need to know if the nanny has an issue, just as I need to react to critical professional demands How often has this situation happen?
Presumably not very often, but that should make it even more acceptable to keep a phone with you during a dinner.
Re: Restaurant offers a 5% discount if you eat without your phone on the table
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your post is very charged. If I am at dinner and I decide that I want to keep on top of my device (I have four children and a very busy professional life), those with me have to deal with it . Most of the time my phone is more important than the discardable conversation happening over a meal. It doesn't make me more important than them, though maybe it means that I have different values. I generally veer away from th…
The issue isn't about angry people controlling others, or about the balance of who regards who as "more important", a point that I think you've mistakenly identified as the crux of the issue. It's about manners and social courtesy. If the people you dine with are "getting angry" and trying to "control" your actions, the likely reason is that you're being offensively rude, and are missing the social signals of people'…
I am very aware of social nuances and cues. I have no lack of people who want to repeatedly go to dinner with me. I also have a busy life, however, so simplified caricatures of the utility of modern conveniences give me a little chuckle, hence my original post. This story is a restaurant capitalizing on the resentment of the few.