EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
1–10 of 52 posts
Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#2Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#3Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#4Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#5Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#6Even if productivity is better this way, isn't there an advantage to being able to hire people from a wider geography, access to a larger talent pool?
I read @paulg and other leadership type YC people support return to office as well. I recall startups competing for talent desperately. That was why silicon valley startups always had crazy perks. If talent was how my business disrupted and dominated, I would want the most access to talent and give them the best working conditions. Perhaps a subtle pivot in priority has happened? Tech companies no longer believe in a talent-centered strategy? Or there is an over abundance of talent?
I'm just trying to give people the benefit of doubt, that this isn't just cruel people unhappy at the sight of improved quality of life for others.
Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#7Probably the worst company I've interviewed for. Yet another reason to stay away
Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#8The problem is, they don't even let most people have actual offices at the office. Even if productivity is better this way, isn't there an advantage to being able to hire people from a wider geography, access to a larger talent pool? I read @paulg and other leadership type YC people support return to office as well. I recall startups competing for talent desperately. That was why silicon valley startups always had cr…
I think it's more of a litmus test: If you care about your work enough that you're willing to come to the office every day (or even move cities/countries), then you'll be extremely engaged.
So by saying "you have to come to the office 5 days a week", you will only get people who are very engaged and will get a lot done—even if it's not because of the office.
I guarantee there's a Venn diagram of extremely engaged people who also prefer (or will exclusively do) remote work, which office-only companies will miss out on.
But when you're in a high talent-density area like NYC/SF maybe that's not a big concern.
So willingness to come to the office becomes a proxy metric for how much you care, which obviously influences your engagement.
Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#9Probably the worst company I've interviewed for. Yet another reason to stay away
Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#10The problem is, they don't even let most people have actual offices at the office. Even if productivity is better this way, isn't there an advantage to being able to hire people from a wider geography, access to a larger talent pool? I read @paulg and other leadership type YC people support return to office as well. I recall startups competing for talent desperately. That was why silicon valley startups always had cr…
I don't think these things are really done because you get more done at an office. I think it's more of a litmus test: If you care about your work enough that you're willing to come to the office every day (or even move cities/countries), then you'll be extremely engaged. So by saying "you have to come to the office 5 days a week", you will only get people who are very engaged and will get a lot done—even if it's not…
Sure, but what if there is another company closer to me (office), or offering hybrid or full remote work? I can about my work just the same elsewhere.
I think you're on the right track, but in my opinion, it is more about having reliable employees than employees who care or are engaged. Your actual performance and talent could be bad, but so long as you won't ask for too much pay and you won't leave any time soon, that is what these companies want more than talent. This is sort of what I was alluding to. disruptive startups would never think this way, but EA isn't that anymore. neither are google or facebook. they're no longer disruptive, they are complacent and spiraling into the IBM and AT&T like mediocrity.