feels like something out of a ted chiang story
It's missing a dash of contemplative philosophical anxiety for a proper Ted Chiang story. But close, indeed.
Human
21–30 of 282 posts
Re: Human
#22"Written by a human [0]" I've been playing around with this on my own blog. I'd like the blogging community to have a consensus on a nice badge we can put at the top of our blog posts, representing who/what wrote the post; - human - hybrid - ai Some might hate the idea of a fully "ai" post, and that's fair. But I like to sometimes treat my blog as just a personal reference, and if after a long day of chasing an esote…
Easy disclaimers for human, AI or hybrid content:
https://disclai.me/r (Oddly enough I built this AI citation tool with exactly those 3 categories a couple years back. Could use some tweaking of course, but I’m very open to suggestions.)
Re: Human
#23And so, all the humans on earth swarmed to see what was going on.
The machines did too.
There was one weird thing, though.
The title of the event was rather mysterious.
It simply read…
“Grand Theft Auto VI”
Re: Human
#24You lost me at 'rumors spread', machines wouldn't spread rumors!
Re: Human
#25> Processor Unit 7382-B, "The Origins of the HUMAN Project," Journal of Experimental Intelligence, vol. 5621, no. 3, pp. 42-89, 19754.
The references section in the machine version of the story linked at the bottom is excellent. Nicely done all around, really enjoyed reading this thank you for writing and sharing <3
Re: Human
#26Why are emotions so special? they're just algorithms like any other. Emotions aren't what make humans different than machines. feeling something is similar to an LLM model reacting to a prompt a certain way. Just because chatgpt is trained to not "feel" anything (to avoid controversial output) doesn't mean LLMs can't feel things like we do. self-awareness, self-training, adaptability, original thinking, critical thinking,etc.. are different questions. but I see no reason why machines can't receive input/stimuli and react/output by the same way we do because of how they feel about the input.
Re: Human
#27[dead]
Re: Human
#28This idea that machines cant have "emotions" is ridiculous.
Re: Human
#29This idea that machines cant have "emotions" is ridiculous.
Can you explain why so? What are your thoughts on this?
Re: Human
#30Related but an aside - Lately I've really been wondering if Skynet actually is the next evolution.
That humans, like all animals before us, are a stepping stone and there is actually no avoiding machine overlords. It happens to literally every existence of life across the universe because the final emergent property of energy gradients 100% leads to pure logic machines.
At least Fermi's paradox helps me sleep better at night.