Live data from Hacker News

Databricks acquires Neon

databricks.com

11–20 of 234 posts

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#11

Maybe unrelated but Databricks is the most annoying garbage I have ever had to use. It fascinates me how anyone uses it by choice.

The market for IBM-like software and platforms (everyone else uses this! It must be good!) apparently wasn't saturated yet

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#13

Maybe unrelated but Databricks is the most annoying garbage I have ever had to use. It fascinates me how anyone uses it by choice.

I used to be a big fan of the platform because back in 2020 / 2021 it really was the only reasonable choice compared to AWS / Azure / Snowflake for building data platforms.

Today it suffers from feature creep and too many pivots & acquisitions. That they are insanely bad at naming features doesn't help either.

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#14
post #10
post #6

I’ve loved Neon and now I’m a little worried. Are there any alternatives?

[Disclaimer: I work for Xata] As it happens, we've just launched our new Xata platform ( https://xata.io/ ) which has some of the key Neon features: instant copy-on-write branching and separation of storage and compute. As an extra twist, we also can do anonymization (PII masking) between your production database and developer branches. The way we do copy-on-write branches is a bit different. We haven't done any modi…

Is this open source? A major point of Neon is that it's open source and self-hostable.

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#15

Maybe unrelated but Databricks is the most annoying garbage I have ever had to use. It fascinates me how anyone uses it by choice.

Really hard disagree. Coming from hadoop, databricks is utopia. It's stable, fast, scales really well if you have massive datasets.

The biggest gripe in have is how crazy expensive it is.

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#16

Guess this is the beginning of the end of a great service, not holding my breath. Sounds like from the WSJ article that they’ll just become some AI agent backend service for Replit, and from the previous conversation on HN that Databricks ruins and shutters their acquisitions. Congrats on the big payout for the employees, though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM3VCYA1e-Q

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#17

Maybe unrelated but Databricks is the most annoying garbage I have ever had to use. It fascinates me how anyone uses it by choice.

With cookies disabled I get a blank website, which is a massive red flag and an immediate nope from me.

Can't imagine someone incapable of building a website would deliver a good (digital) product.

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#18
Big congratulations!

I really do hope that their OSS strategy does not change due to this, as it's really friendly to people who want to learn their product and run smaller deployments. It's (intentionally or not) really hard to run at a big scale as the control plane is not open-source, which makes the model actually work.

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#19

Maybe unrelated but Databricks is the most annoying garbage I have ever had to use. It fascinates me how anyone uses it by choice.

Databricks started in 2013 when Spark sucked (it still does) and they aimed to make it better / faster (which they do).

The product is still centered Spark, but most companies don't want or need Spark and a combination of Iceberg and DuckDB will work for 95% of companies. It's cheaper, just as fast or faster and way easier to reason about.

We're building a data platform around that premise at Definite[0]. It includes everything you need to get started with data (ETL, BI, datalake).

0 - https://www.definite.app/

Post reply on HN