Live data from Hacker News

Starcloud

ycombinator.com

11–20 of 325 posts

Re: Starcloud

#15
Can this possibly make financial sense even if launch costs were zero?

One NVIDIA DGX SuperPOD consumes 10 kW which would be ~500 square feet of solar panels and ~100 square feet of radiator area.

Re: Starcloud

#16
post #5

What does space give us that Earth does not in this scenario? Free real estate? They only mention falling costs for deployment.

There's an answer in their whitepaper[0] - see Table 1. tl;dr - power is continuous and free via solar array

[0] - https://starcloudinc.github.io/wp.pdf

Re: Starcloud

#18
I was wondering if these server racks in space would need to be specifically designed for enough radiative cooling. Apparently the answer is yes: the radiators would be expansive and placed on the reverse side of the solar panels.

Starcloud is developing a lightweight deployable radiator design with a very large area - by far the largest radiators deployed in space - radiating primarily towards deep space, which has an average temperature of about 2.7 Kelvin or -270°C. The radiators can be positioned in-line with the solar arrays as shown in Figure 3, with one side exposed to sunlight.

Figure 3. A data center in Sun Synchronous Orbit, showing a 4km x 4km deployed solar array and radiators.

https://www.starcloud.com/wp

Re: Starcloud

#19
Most expensive IT call ever when you need to go fix that one fried power convertor that everyone said wouldn't fail.

Re: Starcloud

#20
post #8
post #5

What does space give us that Earth does not in this scenario? Free real estate? They only mention falling costs for deployment.

[flagged]

I do wonder about data centers in the arctic. Cut out the middle step of greenhouse gases and melt the polar caps directly.
Post reply on HN