Live data from Hacker News

Django vs. Rails: The Dead-Tree Edition

push.cx

1–10 of 37 posts

Re: Django vs. Rails: The Dead-Tree Edition

#4
post #2

I don't understand, why does it matter?

If it did matter, what would we learn by comparing .NET books w/ Rails books, or Seaside books with Django books. Surely the number of books isn't the point.

A point well illustrated by this particular book from the Rails list: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0470374950/pushcx-20/...

Re: Django vs. Rails: The Dead-Tree Edition

#6
In the spirit of the article, I prove that Jesus is better than Rails, because there are 779 times more books about him.

Jesus books (333,560): http://www.amazon.com/s/qid=1232312844/ref=sr_nr_i_0?ie=UTF8...

Rails books (428): http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b?url=search-alias%3Dstrip...

Re: Django vs. Rails: The Dead-Tree Edition

#10
post #2

I don't understand, why does it matter?

Well, the article says:

I’ll write about why this matters tomorrow.

Tune in tomorrow!

All I can figure is that either (a) Java and/or PHP are about to declare "victory" again, whatever that means, or (b) it will be concluded that the framework with the smallest number of books is superior because the docs are DRYer than everybody else's docs. Which might well be another moral victory for some obscure Lisp dialect.

I'm holding out for option (c): A collectible card game in which teams of software books are assembled to fight holy wars against each other. SICP, I choose you!

Post reply on HN