Live data from Hacker News

Plain Vanilla Web

plainvanillaweb.com

1–10 of 715 posts

Re: Plain Vanilla Web

#4
Very cool overview and a great article—it’s fascinating to see how far web components have come. Data passing, interactivity, and state management still seem pretty tedious in vanilla, though!

Re: Plain Vanilla Web

#6
Question - why would you do this in current year? Is it that much more performant? I might be ignorant but frameworks seem to be the lingua franca for a reason - they make your life much easier to manage once set up!

Re: Plain Vanilla Web

#7
As a react dev I find this fascinating - in the same way I was fascinated by the foraging walk I went on the other day - but was SO HAPPY that supermarkets exist when I saw how much effort it is.

Re: Plain Vanilla Web

#8
Love to see this!

Although I do think there is merit to "light" frameworks such as Astro, with its scoped styling and better component syntax. But at the same time, independence is also important.

I started something similar with https://webdev.bryanhogan.com/ which focuses on writing good and scalable HTML and CSS.

Re: Plain Vanilla Web

#9
I am not sold on web-components yet. Especially now with @scoped and import{type:css}, I think there's still a lot of merit to rendering an element statically, shipping it, and updating it dynamically via modern JS. I'm not sold on how people typically do that, and I think we should keep trying to innovate outside of the typical frameworks like React/Svelte, but I definitely don't see any part of web-components being useful to any type of site I run (and I run several disparate types).

Re: Plain Vanilla Web

#10

As a react dev I find this fascinating - in the same way I was fascinated by the foraging walk I went on the other day - but was SO HAPPY that supermarkets exist when I saw how much effort it is.

No, it's more like fast food vs grocery store & home cooked meals.
Post reply on HN