Live data from Hacker News

Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

es.wired.com

51–60 of 190 posts

Re: Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is not EU R&D budget. This is a small delta, extra funding specifically for attracting US scientists who are looking to move. Comparing this to the total expenditure by the US federal government seems...odd. I asked ChatGPT: "Combining both EU-level and national R&D expenditures, the total R&D spending across the EU in 2023 was approximately €505 billion." But that appears to be total, both government and indust…

I think that the US strongly outperforms the EU by that metric too, https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20246/cross-national-compariso... ( "Cross-National Comparisons of R&D Performance" (2024)) In the NSF's specific definition, the US greatly outspends the EU even normalizing by GDP—3.46% of GDP in the USA, against 2.16% in the EU-27. (Notably, China also recently surpassed the EU, at 2.43%).

Hmm...Wikipidea says "$135.110B in R&D spending" for federal funds.

Now that was 2015, but the number is very similar the EU figure of €136 billion.

There will be be differences, but the point stands that comparing the tiny delta provided by this specific program to total spending is not serious.

Re: Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

#52
post #49
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I salute you for being open about the chatgpt use! Do you really trust what it says? That quoted chatgpt-number has zero value to me. The other numbers are valuable, since they come from actual sources.

What if the links came from the ChatGPT answer as well?

They did.

Re: Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that the US strongly outperforms the EU by that metric too, https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20246/cross-national-compariso... ( "Cross-National Comparisons of R&D Performance" (2024)) In the NSF's specific definition, the US greatly outspends the EU even normalizing by GDP—3.46% of GDP in the USA, against 2.16% in the EU-27. (Notably, China also recently surpassed the EU, at 2.43%).

Hmm...Wikipidea says "$135.110B in R&D spending" for federal funds. Now that was 2015, but the number is very similar the EU figure of €136 billion. There will be be differences, but the point stands that comparing the tiny delta provided by this specific program to total spending is not serious.

Right; that's the federal government spending, while the other's combined R&D from all sources (aligning with 'mpweiher 's comment and their metric).

The nsf.gov page has a breakdown table, too, of government vs. industry spending.

Re: Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

#54
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is not EU R&D budget. This is a small delta, extra funding specifically for attracting US scientists who are looking to move. Comparing this to the total expenditure by the US federal government seems...odd. I asked ChatGPT: "Combining both EU-level and national R&D expenditures, the total R&D spending across the EU in 2023 was approximately €505 billion." But that appears to be total, both government and indust…

I salute you for being open about the chatgpt use! Do you really trust what it says? That quoted chatgpt-number has zero value to me. The other numbers are valuable, since they come from actual sources.

> Do you really trust what it says?

"Really trust"? Nope. But I think it gives me a good ballpark estimate and ways to check if that estimate is about right or not.

Checking the answer is quicker and potentially less error-prone than compiling the answer.

Re: Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmm...Wikipidea says "$135.110B in R&D spending" for federal funds. Now that was 2015, but the number is very similar the EU figure of €136 billion. There will be be differences, but the point stands that comparing the tiny delta provided by this specific program to total spending is not serious.

Right; that's the federal government spending, while the other's combined R&D from all sources (aligning with 'mpweiher 's comment and their metric). The nsf.gov page has a breakdown table, too, of government vs. industry spending.

That turns out not to be the case. The €136 billion was EU + national governments.

Re: Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

#57

You people are too good at critical thinking to read "an investment of 500 million euros between 2025 and 2027" and not instantly write this off as empty grandstanding. How much does—or did, recently—the United States federal government invest in scientists in the USA? Is it ~$70 billion a year? [0] Europe can achieve America's (past) results when Europe starts talking with money. Science migration has historically g…

This is not EU R&D budget. This is a small delta, extra funding specifically for attracting US scientists who are looking to move. Comparing this to the total expenditure by the US federal government seems...odd. I asked ChatGPT: "Combining both EU-level and national R&D expenditures, the total R&D spending across the EU in 2023 was approximately €505 billion." But that appears to be total, both government and indust…

I'm not sure if you can separate this as easily. In Germany for example a lot of funding comes through Max Planck institutes (and Fraunhofer and Leibniz centres and I' forgetting one), not sure if those are counted as government, but they are basically on par with the US national labs (but less military contacts)

Re: Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

#58

Oh well. When Russian scientists were escaping the horrible realities of Putin's regime, had someone in Europe attempted to "lure" them? No, they were fired by hundreds [1] and students were not allowed anymore [2]. Not counting the immense indirect pressure like closing their bank accounts and not prolonging their existing residence documents even when they had jobs. When Ukrainian scientists tried to escape the hor…

> What is the difference?

Neither Russia nor Ukraine are currently known for their bleeding-edge scientific research, and I'm saying this as a Russian myself. I'm sorry but almost everyone who was worth their salt left both countries long before 2022.

Re: Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Europe „needs to pay up […] for Palestine” .. can you expand on this a little why you'd think that?

Yeah, funding a terror group that wants to destroy the west seems like a suboptimal use of our wealth.

You do realize that Hamas and Palestine are not the same thing right, even if they are obviously related? Funding aid for Palestine is not the same as funding Hamas, even if it is impossible to avoid some money being used in ways it’s not supposed to.

Re: Europe launches program to lure scientists away from the US

#60
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This reads like a bitter ex-employee. I guess you were in Germany? There are plenty of European countries that do use English as the working language for technical fields, if there is not enough domestic talent. What you say about the US research ecosystem may have been true until January 2025 but it is unfortuantely no longer the case. At the same time, the EU is finally getting its act together in both defense AND…

I don't know about defense, but on mathstodon people are having bitter laughs over the "500 million for research", when the UK alone with its faltering economy manages to get multiple times that in the same time frame.

Is it 500 million for research or 500 million for luring US researchers to Europe? They are vastly different things so we need to be on the same page for this to be a productive discussion.
Post reply on HN