11–20 of 350 posts
I like how there are IFs and ELSE IFs but those logical constructs aren't actually explicitly followed... and inside the IF instead of a dash as a bullet point there's an arrow.. that's the _syntax_? hah.. what if there were two lines of instructions, you'd make a new line starting with another arrow..? Did they try some form of it without IFs first?...
is this claude the app or the api?
I like how there are IFs and ELSE IFs but those logical constructs aren't actually explicitly followed... and inside the IF instead of a dash as a bullet point there's an arrow.. that's the _syntax_? hah.. what if there were two lines of instructions, you'd make a new line starting with another arrow..? Did they try some form of it without IFs first?...
I’m having reasonable success with these seven tools: read, write, diff, browse, command, ask, think.
There is a minimal template here if anyone finds it useful: https://github.com/aperoc/toolkami
I like how there are IFs and ELSE IFs but those logical constructs aren't actually explicitly followed... and inside the IF instead of a dash as a bullet point there's an arrow.. that's the _syntax_? hah.. what if there were two lines of instructions, you'd make a new line starting with another arrow..? Did they try some form of it without IFs first?...
How did they leak it, jailbreak? Was this confirmed? I am checking for the situation where the true instructions are not what is being reported here. The language model could have "hallucinated" its own system prompt instructions, leaving no guarantee that this is the real deal.
How did they leak it, jailbreak? Was this confirmed? I am checking for the situation where the true instructions are not what is being reported here. The language model could have "hallucinated" its own system prompt instructions, leaving no guarantee that this is the real deal.
How would you detect this? I always wonder about this when I see a 'jail break' or similar for LLM...
How did they leak it, jailbreak? Was this confirmed? I am checking for the situation where the true instructions are not what is being reported here. The language model could have "hallucinated" its own system prompt instructions, leaving no guarantee that this is the real deal.
> The language model could have "hallucinated" its own system prompt instructions, leaving no guarantee that this is the real deal. How would you detect this? I always wonder about this when I see a 'jail break' or similar for LLM...
The actual system prompt, the “public” version, and whatever the model outputs could all be fairly different from each other though.
not sure this is shocking