Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

bloomberg.com

201–210 of 604 posts

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#201
post #25

~$40M ARR makes this a 75x Cursor yesterday was a 45X for comparison (9B, 200M) https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/16/openai-is-reportedly-in-ta...

Growth rate matters a lot though. If they are growing quickly that multiple reduces quickly

You think they can double every year for the next 5 years?

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, the fact that OpenAI, at the bleeding edge of it all, has decided to buy an IDE is a rather strong hint that the future of agents handling entire engineering tickets might be further out than many believe. If autonomous agents were just around the corner, then why wouldn't OpenAI bet on their own Codex product obviating (most) need for an IDE and save themselves the $3 billion?

why OpenAI purchased windsurf instead of prompting openai to create something like windsurf? this is the question i am still asking...

Controlling demand (developer workflow and mindshare) is a good position if you're trying to build scale on supply.

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#203
post #25

~$40M ARR makes this a 75x Cursor yesterday was a 45X for comparison (9B, 200M) https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/16/openai-is-reportedly-in-ta...

keep in mind a lot of $3B is ClosedAI paper money, so 75x ain't that ridiculous.

Do you know the cash / equity split?

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#204
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How are you differentiating from the cline/roo's of the world?

Our plan is to be a superset of Cline and Roo's features (we already have all the major features from both) [0] We also have our own provider, which means no need to bring your own API keys (you can if you like, but it is batteries included by default) and we're not charging anything on top of the API pricing. Instead of monetizing on individual developers, we want it to be free for them and make money eventually off…

I can't find any reference to Cline/Roo charging anything on top of API pricing.

Not sure how they'd do it considering you bring your own API keys. Can you link me to a resource?

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#205
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

VSCode is still miles behind for .NET and C++ tooling, have a bit of fate on VS team.

What’s the use of being miles ahead if you’re traveling in the wrong direction?

Doesn't look like, given Windows market share.

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#206
post #29

Incredible timeline to a $3B exit > Windsurf began in 2021 as Exafunction, founded by MIT graduates Varun Mohan and Douglas Chen. The company initially focused on GPU optimization before pivoting to AI-assisted coding tools, launching Codeium, which later evolved into Windsurf. > Series B (January 2024): $65 million at a $500 million valuation. > Series C (September 2024): $150 million, led by General Catalyst, at a…

The right time and the right place, plus they did the work, ofc; but I'm sure 80% of this site has worked as hard as, or even more, than what it takes to clone VSCode.

I'm jelly. Very rarely you see in history someone lucky enough to be riding the absolute top of the wave. Even OpenAI took about decade to cook their breakthrough product.

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#207

It blows my mind OpenAI wouldn't be able to build a Windsurf alternative for orders of magnitude less than $3B.

They can, of course, but why would they waste time on it? They are buying a tool, talent, and a heap of paying enterprise customers. This is a steal.

And they're probably buying it with equity, not cash.

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#208
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

keep in mind a lot of $3B is ClosedAI paper money, so 75x ain't that ridiculous.

Do you know the cash / equity split?

I do know that OpenAI doesn't have 3B in cash to just throw around.

So, I'd be inclined to believe the vast majority of the deal is stock (or whatever that is called pre-IPO).

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> developers turn out to be the actual profit-driver niche for LLMs AI is definitely huge for anyone writing code, though one can imagine a model like o3 completely replacing 90% of white collar jobs that involve reading, writing and analysis. Interestingly, o3 is particularly bad at legalese, likely not fully by accident. Of all professions whose professional organizations and regulatory capture create huge rents, t…

Your take on lawyers is absolutely insane. If you don't think the extremely specialized and well trained professionals can successfully navigate contracts then I can't wait for the absolute garbage the LLMs spit out when faced with similar challenges. Honestly, same for doctors and accountants. Unless these model providers are willing to provide "guarantees" that they will compensate for damages faced as a result of…

While malpractice insurance exists for human docs and lawyers, there is not really any difference between an ai-powered lawyer drawing up a contract, an ai-powered doc reviewing a chart and recommending next steps, and a self-driving car making a turn.

The most obviously "lethal" case (cars) is already in large scale rollout worldwide.

At scale, self-driving car "errors" will fall under general liability insurance coverage, most likely. Firms will probably carry some insurance as well just in case.

LLMs already write better prose than 95% of humans and models like o3 reason better than 90% of humans on many tasks.

In both law and medicine there are many pre-existing safeguards that have been created to reduce error rates for human practitioners (checklists, text search tools (lexis nexis, uptodate, etc.), continuing education, etc.) which can be applied to AI professionals too.

Re: OpenAI reaches agreement to buy Windsurf for $3B

#210

$3B for a fork of an IDE which Microsoft keeps crippling by the day by making it's best extensions not work with forks (eg. C++, Python, C#, Remote SSH, etc)..

It's easy to downplay as a fork because it's such a young product but ultimately if people use Cursor or Windsurf instead of VSCode then it is VSCode that needs to worry about being upstream from them and Cursor or Windsurf making their extensions no longer work with VSCode.

Microsoft "owns" OpenAI, which now owns Windsurf, which cloned VSCode.

I think it's going to be fine.

This is xAI buying Twitter, with extra steps.

Post reply on HN