Anyone noticed that streaming services start to compromise on quality? With Netflix it's been like that for a while. Apple TV+ seems to be the best. I really want to get into Blu-ray now, looking for a decent player.
I would describe Disney as barely 720p when used in any web browser.
Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
51–60 of 306 posts
Re: Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
#52Anyone noticed that streaming services start to compromise on quality? With Netflix it's been like that for a while. Apple TV+ seems to be the best. I really want to get into Blu-ray now, looking for a decent player.
Netflix is "4K Ultra HD: Up to 7 GB per hour". Blu ray is 25GB per side, so max 50GB for 2 layers. Typical movies are 35-50GB. So, BR, and think even DVD still looks much better than any streaming service!
We’re going to have to disagree about DVDs though. They look awful on modern (big) televisions.
Re: Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
#53Re: Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
#54I’m sorry, but could someone please elaborate on the significance of this post?
Re: Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
#55What's the relevance of this?
Re: Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Life is great on the high seas. I've spent nearly 16 years "Passing the Popcorn" and couldn't be happier.
Question: what's the streaming budget for the big platforms? Can they offer 50-100 mbps? For example, a 70 gb video for a 2.5 hour movie would need 67 mbps to stream. Having access to a rip like that for a popular movie (meaning new or classic) is normal "on the high seas" and it has a detectable difference on my budget-tier setup compared to a ~20 gb rip. I'm wondering if streaming platforms can afford to offer some…
Re: Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
#57I’m sorry, but could someone please elaborate on the significance of this post?
It beautifully captures the golden age.
Re: Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
#58Anyone noticed that streaming services start to compromise on quality? With Netflix it's been like that for a while. Apple TV+ seems to be the best. I really want to get into Blu-ray now, looking for a decent player.
Netflix is "4K Ultra HD: Up to 7 GB per hour". Blu ray is 25GB per side, so max 50GB for 2 layers. Typical movies are 35-50GB. So, BR, and think even DVD still looks much better than any streaming service!
Are pressed Blu-Rays limited compared to writeable ones?
I have 100GB BDXL blanks (single-sided) I use as one of the archives for my family photos/videos.
Couldn't a film BluRay also be 100GB on a single side?
Re: Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
#59Great movie! So many big named actors in it! The director also did Field of Dreams!
I'm not a fan of baseball, but I liked Field of Dreams (at the age I was back when it would have made it to Australian TV).
Re: Sneakers (1992) – 4K makeover sourced from the original camera negative
#60Anyone noticed that streaming services start to compromise on quality? With Netflix it's been like that for a while. Apple TV+ seems to be the best. I really want to get into Blu-ray now, looking for a decent player.
Netflix is "4K Ultra HD: Up to 7 GB per hour". Blu ray is 25GB per side, so max 50GB for 2 layers. Typical movies are 35-50GB. So, BR, and think even DVD still looks much better than any streaming service!